IFRS and US GAAP authorised CMUCPP maintains the constant purchasing power of constant real value non-monetary items (e.g. capital, all items in shareholders´ equity, provisions, salaries, wages, pensions, taxes, trade debtors/creditors, etc) in terms of a Daily CPI in entities that at least break even in real value during low and high inflation, hyperinflation and deflation - ceteris paribus. European Accounting Assoc: "Capital maintenance is a competing objective of financial reporting."
Deloitte and Canadian AcSB support IASB´s delusional view that IFRSs do not permit financial capital maintenance in units of constant purchasing power during non-hyperinflationary conditions
Deloitte and the Canadian Accounting Standards Board support the IASB´s delusional view that IFRSs do not permit financial capital maintenance in units of constant purchasing power during non-hyperinflationary conditions The IASB in its interpretation of this matter admitted that:
I suggested to the IASB during these proceedings that they contact top accounting authorities in formerly hyperinflationary countries like Dr Gustavo Franco, the ex-Governor of the Central Bank of Brazil and Dr Cemal Kucusozen from Turkey, but they simply rejected my suggestions. They rather rely on people who had no experience of high and hyperinflation.
The above views expressed by the IASB, Deloitte and the Canadia Accounting Standard Board carry little weight since they have previously clearly shown that they are clueless about the critical importance of the capital maintenance concept in the accounting framework as directly stated by Australia CPA and the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Australia, specifically about the IASB as follows:
Canadian accounting authorities demonstrated a similar lack of knowledge about capital maintenance during non-hyperinflationary conditions with the following reply from THE CERTIFIED GENERAL ACCOUNTANTS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA: