Pages

Monday 27 May 2013

UNDERSTANDING CAPITAL MAINTENANCE IN UNITS OF CONSTANT PURCHASING POWER

UNDERSTANDING CAPITAL MAINTENANCE IN UNITS OF CONSTANT PURCHASING POWER



DEFINITION: Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power (CMUCPP) is the maintenance of the constant purchasing power of capital for an indefinite period of time at all levels of inflation and deflation in entities that at least break even in real value – ceteris paribus – in units of constant purchasing power in terms of an index that recognizes all, normally daily, changes in the general price level (Smith 2012 Ch 1.15).
Capital is equal to the real value of net assets (Smith 2012 Ch 12.2).
The general price level can change more than once a day (even hourly) during hyperinflation (Hanke and Kwok 2009, p 359, Smith 2012 Ch 11.7).
The following are all forms of CMUCPP:
1.      Indexation
2.      Monetary correction
3.      Price-level accounting
4.      Price-level restatement
of non-monetary items (including equity) in countries with high or hyperinflation (Central Bank of Chile 2002 p 8).
5.      Restatement of Historical Cost or Current Cost financial statements in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period during hyperinflation as required in IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies (IAS 29 Par 8).
CMUCPP is a relatively old capital maintenance concept.

‘The consumer price index was first used in 1707. In 1925 it became institutionalized when the Second International Conference of Labour Statisticians, convened by the International Labour Organization, promulgated the first international standards of measurement.’  (Vink, Kirsten and Woermann 2004 p 217)



CMUCPP in the form of indexation (monetary correction) or price-level restatement was widely used in Latin America from the early 1960´s (Lefort and Schmidt-Hebbel 2002 p 2).
‘A common feature of financial statements that are prepared throughout Latin America is that they are adjusted in some way to take into consideration the economic effects of price changes in the local economy (Nobes and Parker 1991).  In the case of Chile, this adjustment primarily reflects changes in the general price level.  The values of assets, liabilities and owners’ equity that are not fixed in terms of the local currency are restated to reflect changes in the purchasing power of the local currency.  The unrealized gains and losses that result from this restatement are recorded as a single line-item in the income statement that is referred to as the “monetary correction” (corrección monetaria).’ (Jennings and Maturana 2005 p 86)
CMUCPP has been used in Venezuela in the form of IAS 29 from 2009 (PricewaterhouseCoopers 2009) to the present (2013). Brazil used CMUCPP very successfully in the form of indexation (monetary correction) in terms of different government-supplied daily indices under different governments from 1964 till 1994 (Central Bank of Brazil 2007).
Advantages of CMUCPP
CMUCPP in terms of an index that recognizes all (normally daily) changes in the general price level would:
1.   Maintain the constant purchasing power of capital constant for an indefinite period of time in all entities that at least break even in real value – ceteris paribus – at all levels of inflation and deflation, including during hyperinflation (Smith 2012).
2.   Stabilize the constant real value non-monetary item economy at all levels of inflation or deflation including during hyperinflation (see Brazil from 1964 to 1994).   
‘Indexation also has macroeconomic implications. In particular, indexation has played a critical role in many stabilization programs.’ (Lefort and Schmidt-Hebbel 2002 p 1)
    3.  Maintain the constant purchasing of all constant items besides equity, e.g.,
salaries, wages, rents, etc. by means of measurement in units of constant purchasing power in terms of a daily index.
‘Indexation allows the system of relative prices to survive large inflation shocks. Wage and financial indexation are clear examples of arrangements that accomplish this purpose. Wage indexation substitutes for the need for frequent renegotiation of wages and may reduce labor market transactions costs in economies where inflation is at least moderate.’ (Lefort and Schmidt-Hebbel 2002 p 1)
     4. Maintain the real value of monetary items constant when they are inflation-adjusted in terms of a daily index.
‘And the experience of several emerging economies shows that indexing financial instruments may be key to success in developing liquid long-term fixed-income markets.’ (Lefort and Schmidt-Hebbel 2002 p 1)
CMUCPP authorized in IFRS
CMUCPP was originally authorized in IFRS as an option to financial capital maintenance in nominal monetary units (Historical Cost Accounting) at all levels of inflation and deflation in the original Framework (1989) Par 104 (a) [now the Conceptual Framework (2010) Par 4.59 (a)] which states ‘Financial capital maintenance can be measured in either nominal monetary units or units of constant purchasing power.’
CMUCPP implied in IAS 29
CMUCPP during hyperinflation is implied in IAS 29. CMUCPP, i.e., restatement required in IAS 29, is the only accounting model specifically prescribed in IFRS.
‘At the present time, it is not the intention of the Board to prescribe a particular model other than in exceptional circumstances, such as for those entities reporting in the currency of a hyperinflationary economy.’ (Conceptual Framework (2010) Par 4.65)
IFRS are principles-based standards. (ICAS 2006 p20) The principle of CMUCPP was originally authorized in the Framework (1989) Par 104 (a). The requirement is implied/inferred in IAS 29 since restatement of non-monetary items (including equity) in terms of the general price index is a form of CMUCPP.
(1)   IAS 29 Par 24 requires nominal capital to be restated by applying a general price index which is measurement in units of constant purchasing power by applying a general price index during hyperinflation.
(2)   Par 12 and 14 define monetary items and classifies non-monetary items. Current period nominal monetary items are generally not inflation-adjusted during the reporting year.  
(3)   Par 27 and 28 require the accounting of net monetary gains and losses.  
(4)   Par 26 requires the restatement (measurement in units of constant purchasing power) of all items in the statement of comprehensive income.
The above four features are all CMUCPP features.
Daily Index
The implementation of an index that recognizes all changes (normally daily changes) in the general price level would maintain the constant purchasing power of capital and profits as was done very successfully in Brazil from 1964 till 1994.
Daily indices were also used elsewhere in Latin America, e.g., in Chile with the very successful Unidad de Fomento (UF) (Shiller 1998) – still used in Chile today – the world´s first inflation-indexed unit of account that was copied in Mexico, Colombia (the Real Value Unit used currently) and Ecuador (Lefort and Schmidt-Hebbel 2002 p 5).
Daily indices that could be used during hyperinflation are:
(1) The US Dollar or another relatively stable foreign currency parallel exchange rate as a generally available substitute for a daily index representing current real value where the parallel rate´s use is accepted (officially allowed) and the greater part of the  economy is valued in terms of the parallel rate or
(2) A Brazilian-style Unidade-Real-de-Valor-based daily index that was almost entirely made up of the US Dollar daily exchange rate during hyperinflation or
(3) A Daily CPI at initial levels of hyperinflation.
‘Another coordination problem is that we must decide, and agree, on a way to smooth the CPI. We should not define prices just in terms of the latest CPI because the CPI is vulnerable to sudden jumps from month to month. This is particularly true when we are talking about indexing financial contracts to the CPI. A unit of account like the UF would smooth out the CPI movements, otherwise there would be important jumps in deposit balances on the dates of new announcements of the CPI. Thus, the smoothing of the CPI in producing the UF has also been a fundamental part of the functioning of the UF as an analogue of money. (Shiller 1998 p 13)
Smoothing is a lagged, daily interpolation of the monthly published CPI. There are no surprises with a Daily CPI: it is always known in advance, e.g., the US Daily CPI Index.
Daily CPI
The Daily CPI – available in all countries that issue government capital inflation-indexed bonds, i.e., in almost the entire world economy, is a one to four month (Olfasson and Jonsson 2007 p 2) lagged, daily interpolation of the monthly published general price level Consumer Price Index (Shiller 1998). The Daily CPI normally recognizes all changes in the general price level (when the CPI is recognized as the general price level) during low inflation, high inflation, initial hyperinflation and deflation.
The following are links to Daily CPIs
US
Daily CPIs are currently being used in most of the world economy to inflation-adjust more than USD 3.4 trillion sovereign capital inflation-indexed bonds on a daily basis.
CMUCPP used (not implemented) in low inflationary countries too
CMUCPP was implemented in a number of countries, including Turkey, Russia and Zimbabwe during hyperinflation in terms of IAS 29 since 1990, the year of first implementation of the standard (IAS 29). CMUCPP is currently (2013) being implemented during hyperinflation in Venezuela and Belarus in terms of IAS 29. CMUCPP has been used since 1990 in terms of IAS 29 and is currently being used in terms of IAS 29 by multi-nationals with subsidiaries in hyperinflationary countries, in low inflationary countries too when they consolidated/consolidate the financial statements of these subsidiaries in their consolidated financial statements.
Constant real value non-monetary items
The constant item constant purchasing power concept of capital (Smith 2012 Ch 1.21.1.(iii)) is implemented under CMUCPP. Constant real value non-monetary items (Smith 2007, 2012 Ch 4) are inferred in IFRS in the Conceptual Framework (2010) Par 4.59 (a).
Capital is a non-monetary item. Non-monetary items to be measured in units of constant purchasing power are thus constant real value non-monetary items or simply constant items. They include issued share capital, retained earnings, capital reserves, all other items in equity, trade debtors, trade creditors, all other non-monetary receivables, all other non-monetary payables, all items in the income statement, provisions, etc. They are always and everywhere measured in units of constant purchasing power in terms of an index that recognizes all changes in the general price level (Smith 2012 Ch 4).
Variable real value non-monetary items
Non-monetary items that are not constant items are variable real value non-monetary items (Smith 2007, 2012 Ch 3) or simply variable items. They include property, plant, equipment, trademarks, quoted and unquoted shares, foreign exchange, inventories, etc. They are measured in terms of IFRS excluding the stable measuring unit assumption (Smith 2012 Ch3).
The stable measuring unit assumption is never implemented under ideal CMUCPP (Smith 2012 Ch 1.11.1).
(a)   Net monetary gains and losses and
(b)   Net constant purchasing power gains and losses
are calculated and accounted under CMUCPP.
Trade debtors, trade creditors, other non-monetary payables and other non-monetary receivables are generally accepted under the HCA model – including in IAS 29 – to be monetary items (PricewaterhouseCoopers 2006 p 7). They are constant real value non-monetary items under CMUCPP since they are linked to underlying non-monetary items.
The calculation and accounting of (a) net monetary gains and losses and (b) net constant purchasing power losses and gains are the same under CMUCPP. Non-monetary receivables´ and non-monetary payables´ (CMUCPP classification) different classifications under the two models are consequently not a problem as far as the accounting of the above net gains or losses under IAS 29 and ideal CMUCPP is concerned.
Value date
The value date under CMUCPP is the current date; i.e., today because the stable measuring unit assumption is never implemented under this model. All items (monetary and non-monetary items) in financial statements at a date in the past are always accessed/viewed/presented/stated/valued/measured at the current, i.e., today´s Daily CPI during low and high inflation and deflation or today´s daily US Dollar parallel rate during hyperinflation (Smith 2012 Ch 4.13.20) .
CMUCPP was specifically proposed to the International Accounting Standards Board in January 2012 in the proposal ‘IFRS “X” CAPITAL MAINTENANCE IN UNITS OF CONSTANT PURCHASING POWER’ (Smith 2012 Ch 12) as the replacement for IAS 29 which was identified by the IASB as a future priority research project entitled Financial Reporting in High Inflationary Economies.
REFERENCES
CENTRAL BANK OF BRAZIL 2007 Written communication as quoted in Smith 2012 Ch 1.9
CENTRAL BANK OF CHILE 2002 VIII Meeting on Central Banks Accounting and Budgetary Aspects. Effects of inflation in financial statements
GUCENME U and ARSOY A P 2005 Changes in financial reporting in Turkey, Historical Development of Inflation Accounting 1960 – 2005  Academy of Accounting Historians 2005 Research Conference 6-8 Oct 2005 Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA
HANKE S H and KWOK A K F 2009 On the Measurement of Zimbabwe’s Hyperinflation, Cato Journal Vol 29 No 2 (Spring/Summer 2009) pp 353–64
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF SCOTLAND (ICAS), 2006 Principles-based or Rules-based Accounting Standards. A Question of Judgement
JENNINGS R and MATURANA G 2005 The Usefulness of Chilean Inflation Accounting Revista ABANTE Vol 8 Nº 1 pp 85-118 April 2005
LEFORT F and SCHMIDT-HEBBEL K (eds) 2002  Indexation, Inflation, and Monetary Policy Central Bank of Chile
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS 2006 Understanding IAS 29
SHILLER R J 1998 Indexed Units of Account: Theory and Assessment of Historical Experience Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper Nº 1171
VINK N, KIRSTEN J and WOERMANN C, 2004, South Africa’s Consumer Price Index for food (CPIF): A comparative historical view Agrekon, June 2004, Vol 43, No 2 pp 217-227




Nicolaas Smith Copyright (c) 2005-2013 Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved. No reproduction without permission.

Saturday 25 May 2013

Example of Daily versus monthly CPI under IAS 29




Example of Daily versus monthly CPI under IAS 29

The following are data showing a derived monthly CPI and Daily CPI for Zimbabwe from 1 November 2007 till 31 December 2007 based on actual monthly inflation percentages. Only the monthly inflation information is actual data from the Central Bank of Zimbabwe. The rest are all theoretically derived data.

Application of IAS 29 and CMUCPP using data from Zimbabwe
 
Monthly inflation rates reported by the CB of Zimbabwe from Mar 2007 till July 2008 (Steve Hanke article)
Date
Derived relatively stable foreign curreny rate
Mnthly
Derived Monthly CPI on month-end
ZimDollars per 1 US Dollar
Inflation %
URV based Daily Index on other days
Zim$/USD rate based on derived CPI
Month-end Daily Index assumed = CPI
01/nov/07
43,8769
4 387,69
02/nov/07
45,7184
4 571,84
03/nov/07
47,5598
4 755,98
04/nov/07
49,4012
4 940,12
05/nov/07
51,2427
5 124,27
06/nov/07
53,0841
5 308,41
07/nov/07
54,9256
5 492,56
08/nov/07
56,7670
5 676,70
09/nov/07
58,6084
5 860,84
10/nov/07
60,4499
6 044,99
11/nov/07
62,2913
6 229,13
12/nov/07
64,1327
6 413,27
13/nov/07
65,9742
6 597,42
14/nov/07
67,8156
6 781,56
15/nov/07
69,6570
6 965,70
16/nov/07
71,4985
7 149,85
17/nov/07
73,3399
7 333,99
18/nov/07
75,1813
7 518,13
19/nov/07
77,0228
7 702,28
20/nov/07
78,8642
7 886,42
21/nov/07
80,7056
8 070,56
22/nov/07
82,5471
8 254,71
23/nov/07
84,3885
8 438,85
24/nov/07
86,2300
8 623,00
25/nov/07
88,0714
8 807,14
26/nov/07
89,9128
8 991,28
27/nov/07
91,7543
9 175,43
28/nov/07
93,5957
9 359,57
29/nov/07
95,4371
9 543,71
30/nov/07
97,2786
131,42
9 727,86
01/dez/07
104,8117
10 481,17
02/dez/07
112,3448
11 234,48
03/dez/07
119,8779
11 987,79
04/dez/07
127,4111
12 741,11
05/dez/07
134,9442
13 494,42
06/dez/07
142,4773
14 247,73
07/dez/07
150,0105
15 001,05
08/dez/07
157,5436
15 754,36
09/dez/07
165,0767
16 507,67
10/dez/07
172,6098
17 260,98
11/dez/07
180,1430
18 014,30
12/dez/07
187,6761
18 767,61
13/dez/07
195,2092
19 520,92
14/dez/07
202,7423
20 274,23
15/dez/07
210,2755
21 027,55
16/dez/07
217,8086
21 780,86
17/dez/07
225,3417
22 534,17
18/dez/07
232,8749
23 287,49
19/dez/07
240,4080
24 040,80
20/dez/07
247,9411
24 794,11
21/dez/07
255,4742
25 547,42
22/dez/07
263,0074
26 300,74
23/dez/07
270,5405
27 054,05
24/dez/07
278,0736
27 807,36
25/dez/07
285,6067
28 560,67
26/dez/07
293,1399
29 313,99
27/dez/07
300,6730
30 067,30
28/dez/07
308,2061
30 820,61
29/dez/07
315,7392
31 573,92
30/dez/07
323,2724
32 327,24
31/dez/07
330,8055
240,06
33 080,55

                                                                                                                                     

 

Example

Zimbabwean company formed on 1 November 2007 with USD 1000 in capital invested on day one in stock and sold on day one with a 300 percent markup. IAS 29 applied in terms of the monthly CPI and the Daily CPI.

     Hist Cost
Date
Dr
Cr
Dr
Cr
USD
USD
Zim$
Zim$
1/11/07
Capital
1000
43 877
1/11/07
Stock
1000
43 877
1/11/07
Bank
4000
175 508
1/11/07
Sales
4000
175 508
30/11/07
31/12/07
P+L – CoS
1000
43 877
31/12/07
Stock
1000
43 877
 
31/12/07
Sale
4000
175 508
31/12/07
P+L – Sales
4000
175 508
31/12/07
Net Monetary Loss
-
-
-
-
31/12/07
P+L - Net Mon Loss
-
-
-
-
31/12/07
Net Monetary Loss
-
-
-
-
31/12/07
Ret Profit/Loss
3000
131 631
31/12/07
P+L - Ret Profit/Loss
3000
Profit
Profit

 

 

IAS 29 with monthly CPI
Date
Daily CPI
Z$/USD
Conv
Dr
Cr
Derived
Derived
Factor
Zim$
Zim$
1/11/07
4 387,69
43,8769
Capital
3,40
149 208
1/11/07
4 387,69
43,8769
Stock
3,40
149 208
1/11/07
4 387,69
43,8769
Bank
1,00
175 508
1/11/07
4 387,69
43,8769
Sales
3,40
596 831
30/11/07
9 727,86
97,2786
3,40
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
P+L – CoS
3,40
149 208
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
Stock
3,40
149 208
 
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
Sales
3,40
596 831
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
P+L - Sales
3,40
596 831
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
Net Monetary Loss
421 322
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
P+L - Net Mon Loss
421 322
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
Net Monetary Loss
421 322
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
Ret Profit/Loss
26 301
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
P+L - Ret Profit/Loss
26 301
1 939 700
1 939 700
Profit

 

 

IAS 29 with Daily CPI
Date
Daily CPI
Z$/USD
Conv
Dr
Cr
Derived
Derived
Factor
Zim$
Zim$
1/11/07
4 387,69
43,8769
Capital
7,54
330 806
1/11/07
4 387,69
43,8769
Stock
7,54
330 806
1/11/07
4 387,69
43,8769
Bank
1,00
175 508
1/11/07
4 387,69
43,8769
Sales
7,54
1 323 222
30/11/07
9 727,86
97,2786
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
P+L - CoS
7,54
330 806
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
Stock
7,54
330 806
 
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
Sales
7,54
1 323 222
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
P+L - Sales
7,54
1 323 222
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
Net Monetary Loss
7,54
1 147 714
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
P+L - Net Mon Loss
7,54
1 147 714
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
Net Monetary Loss
7,54
1 147 714
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
Ret Profit/Loss
155 298
31/12/07
33 080,55
330,8055
P+L - Ret Profit/Loss
155 298
4 611 067
4 611 067
Loss

 

From the above examples we can see that the results under IAS 29 with a Daily CPI is different from IAS 29 with the monthly CPI. The Daily CPI data show what really happened.

When all sales are for cash, net equity will be the same under both the monthly and Daily CPI. This is only the case when all sales are only for cash.

Under IAS 29 applying HC principles, sales for cash and on credit would have the same result. Debtors are monetary items under HCA and as IAS 29 is implemented. Not under CMUCPP in terms of a Daily CPI. Debtors are constant real value non-monetary items under CMUCPP since they are always linked to non-monetary items and the result would be the same as in USD: no loss at all in the real value of Debtors, i.e., no Net Constant Purchasing Power Loss that is calculated in the same way as the Net Monetary Loss. Profit would be better than in USD. Ideal CMUCPP results in zero erosion of real value, i.e., the same as under zero inflation. There is still erosion of real value in USD since USD accounts assumes the low inflation in the USD does not exist, i.e., the HC stable measuring unit assumption is applied.

Ideal CMUCPP in terms of a Daily Index would result in actual zero erosion of real value in all entities that at least break even in real value – ceteris paribus – at all levels of inflation and deflation.

 
Nicolaas Smith

Copyright (c) 2005-2013 Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved. No reproduction without permission.