What to do
with the world´s accumulated Historical Cost Accounting loss
Entities preparing their financial statements based on
the historical cost basis generally do not know whether they have maintained
the constant purchasing power of their equity constant over time.
The test would be to measure every item in current
equity in units of constant purchasing power as from the date each item was
contributed or came about over the entity´s lifetime and then to compare that
total value with the company´s current net asset value measured in real value,
i.e. no item in current net assets to be stated at historical cost, but at fair
value.
This would be required to be done by an entity
adopting financial capital maintenance in unit of constant purchasing power as
authorized in IFRS in the Conceptual Framework (2010), Par. 4.59 (a) instead of
financial capital maintenance in units of nominal monetary units, the
traditional HCA model.
In most entities this would result in an enormous
accumulated Historical Cost Accounting loss to be accounted as part of equity.
The net effect would be an enomous increase in the
nominal value of equity (measured in units of constant purchasing power over
the entity´s lifetime to date) together with and enormous accumulated Historical
Cost Accounting loss, but resulting in the same current net equity real value
being equal to the current real value of net assets before and after the above
calcultions are made.
It is thus advisable to rather simply value current
net assets in real value and state that as the constant real value of current
equity to be maintained constant as from here on foreward by means of financial
capital maintenance in units of constant purchasing power.
It is very doubtful that tax authorities would accept
the sudden calculation of enormous accumulated Historical Cost Accounting losses
which would represent the erosion of equity by the stable measuring unit
assumption (HCA) over the lifetime of the entity to date under the Historical
Cost paradigm.
In countries which allow the write-off of profits
against accumulated losses over five years, for example, it would mean that no
taxes would be paid by entities over the next five years in the case of an
entire country adopting financial capital maintenance in units of constant
purchasing power as from the same date. No country would accept not receiving
any taxes from the corporate sector for five years.
This could be overcome in two ways:
- The accumulated HCA loss not being allowed for tax purposes. It
would thus remain on entities´ balance sheets over many years till it is
written off against future profits. The net constant real value of equity
would be correct and be maintained constant correctly by means of
financial capital maintenance in units of constant purchasing power. This
option would be costly in terms of accounting time spent on the
calculations. It would reveal the real cost today of having implemented
HCA over the lifetime of an entity.
- Do not value past additions to equity in units of constant purchasing
power and do not calculate the current HCA accumualted loss. Value current
equity at the real value of current net assets and implement financial
capital maintenance in units of constant purchasing as from the current
date foreward. This option would have no extra costs, but would hide the
accumulated cost of having implemented the HCA model over the lifetime of
the entiy.
The second
option is obviously the better choice.
So, the
answer to the question: what to do about the world´s accumulated HCA loss is:
just ignore it J in time-honoured accounting fashion.
However, it
is actually required to stop the hundreds of billions of US Dollars (2012) in
real value eroded each and every year by the implementation of the stable
measuring unit assumption (HCA) in the world´s constant item economy during
inflation and hyperinflation.
I do realize
that may only happen a hunderd or more years from now (2012). Individual
companies (even countries) are free to start anytime they like. It was
authorized in IFRS in 1989.
Nicolaas Smith Copyright (c) 2005-2012 Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved. No reproduction without permission.
No comments:
Post a Comment