Real Value Accounting is something completely different from the very old Historical Cost Debate. That debate was about the valuing of mainly variable items. Real Value Accounting is only about the valuing of constant items.
It is not really unknown since it is similar to IAS 29 with monthly updating in terms of the Consumer Price Index in non-hyperinflationary economies and daily updating in terms of a daily index or the parallel rate in hyperinflationary economies like Zimbabwe. Very similar to the very successful Unidade Real de Valor in Brazil.
It is not a complex method once you forget historical costs and start thinking only in real values: only update all constant items. The rest is SA GAAP excluding the stable measuring unit assumption. Obviously all items have to be brought up to date to today´s real value. Brazil did it for 30 years from 1964 to 1994.
I want the average Joe to realize that SA Chartered Accountants are killing the real economy in SA with their silly assumption that the Rand is PERFECTLY stable ONLY for the purpose of valuing CONSTANT items NEVER or not fully updated, e.g. retained income. Retain income does not really concern the average Joe.
What does concern the average Joe/Jane in SA is that under Real Value Accounting his/her salary will automatically be updated monthly every time the new CPI value is published. Salaries will thus automatically be maintained at their real values thus maintaining internal demand in SA. So too personal, company and value added taxes thus maintaining the real value of government´s tax base. And so forth with all constant items in the SA economy.
This will increase SA GDP, increase the economic rate of growth and result in 0% inflation ONLY in the real economy. Tito Mboweni and the other wise people at the SARB will still have to lower cash inflation from its current very high 10.6% level keeping in mind that the total of all underlying values systems in SA determine the internal and external value of the Rand.
Monday 28 April 2008
Saturday 26 April 2008
SA Chartered Accountants´s silly assumption
All underlying value systems determine the value of the Rand. It is not so easy to fix all of them at the same time.
Sometimes we do not even know how our actions are effecting the economy.
Like Chartered Accountants killing the real economy with their silly assumption that the Rand is perfectly stable (no inflation - can you believe that!!) ONLY for the purpose of accounting/valuing constant real value items like retained income. They destroy maybe hundreds of billions of Rand in retained income real value each and every year. AND, they do not even know they are doing it. Hardly anyone knows.
Stopping their silly assumption that the Rand is perfectly stable (no inflation) ONLY for that one purpose will pump maybe hundreds of billions of Rand into the SA economy - by maintaing the real value of retained income and other constant items instead of destroying them. It is simple maths.
Sometimes we do not even know how our actions are effecting the economy.
Like Chartered Accountants killing the real economy with their silly assumption that the Rand is perfectly stable (no inflation - can you believe that!!) ONLY for the purpose of accounting/valuing constant real value items like retained income. They destroy maybe hundreds of billions of Rand in retained income real value each and every year. AND, they do not even know they are doing it. Hardly anyone knows.
Stopping their silly assumption that the Rand is perfectly stable (no inflation) ONLY for that one purpose will pump maybe hundreds of billions of Rand into the SA economy - by maintaing the real value of retained income and other constant items instead of destroying them. It is simple maths.
Wednesday 23 April 2008
A foreign currency is not money in South Africa
A foreign currency is not money in South Africa since it is not the generally accepted national unit of account.
Money has three functions:
1. Medium of exchange
2. Store of value
3. Unit of account
A foreign currency like the US Dollar or the Euro is a medium of exchange in South Africa. Some businesses and individuals will accept US Dollars or Euros as a means of payment, that is, as a medium of exchange because they can easily sell the foreign currency amounts at their local banks for Rands.
A "hard currency" is also a store of value in South Africa. The US Dollar and the Euro are “hard currencies” with daily changing market values. They are generally accepted world wide as a store of value. People know that there are daily small changes in their exchange values.
US Dollars or Euros are, however, not the generally accepted and legal national unit of account. They are thus not money in South Africa since they do not fulfil all three functions of money.
Foreign currencies are variable real value non-monetary items in South Africa.
The US Dollar is only money outside the United States of America in countries like Ecuador and Panama that have dollarized their economies. They use the US Dollar as their functional currency. They do not have their own national currencies. The US Dollar is both foreign exchange and functional currency only in countries that have dollarized their economies. That is not the case in South Africa.
Cabo Verde is planning to use the Euro as its national functional currency.
It appears very strange to state that the US Dollar or the Euro is not money. Technically speaking that is correct because an economic item can only be money if it fulfils all three functions of money. The Euro is only money in the European Monetary Union and the US Dollar is only money in the US and in countries that have dollarized their economies, e.g., Panama and Ecuador.
Money has three functions:
1. Medium of exchange
2. Store of value
3. Unit of account
A foreign currency like the US Dollar or the Euro is a medium of exchange in South Africa. Some businesses and individuals will accept US Dollars or Euros as a means of payment, that is, as a medium of exchange because they can easily sell the foreign currency amounts at their local banks for Rands.
A "hard currency" is also a store of value in South Africa. The US Dollar and the Euro are “hard currencies” with daily changing market values. They are generally accepted world wide as a store of value. People know that there are daily small changes in their exchange values.
US Dollars or Euros are, however, not the generally accepted and legal national unit of account. They are thus not money in South Africa since they do not fulfil all three functions of money.
Foreign currencies are variable real value non-monetary items in South Africa.
The US Dollar is only money outside the United States of America in countries like Ecuador and Panama that have dollarized their economies. They use the US Dollar as their functional currency. They do not have their own national currencies. The US Dollar is both foreign exchange and functional currency only in countries that have dollarized their economies. That is not the case in South Africa.
Cabo Verde is planning to use the Euro as its national functional currency.
It appears very strange to state that the US Dollar or the Euro is not money. Technically speaking that is correct because an economic item can only be money if it fulfils all three functions of money. The Euro is only money in the European Monetary Union and the US Dollar is only money in the US and in countries that have dollarized their economies, e.g., Panama and Ecuador.
Sunday 20 April 2008
Inflation destroys R168 billion of real value in M3 and SA accountants some unknown value in the real economy.
SA can prevent the destruction of real value by non-monetary inflation in the real economy by banning the stable measuring unit assumption. Stated in another way: ban SA accountants´ silly assumption that money is perfectly stable only for the purpose of valuing constant real value non-monetary items never updated, eg. retained income, or not fully updated, eg. salaries, wages, taxes, etc.
The accounted part of the R168 billion destroyed in M3 would be taken to the profit and loss account as a net monetary loss. It is not presently done like that.
SA accountants currently destroy hundreds of billions of Rand in retained income real value and in all other constant values never of not fully updated each and every year. They are killing that part of the real economy. This is an unknown percentage lower than 10% per annum of the real economy. This destruction of real value only happens in constant real value non-monetary items never or not fully updated. Salaries and wages are not always fully updated, for example. The full 10% destruction only takes place in constant values never updated, eg. retained income.
That is one of SA´s structural problems. Another is the 3 to 6% inflation target. It should be targeted at an upper limit of 2% like in Europe and the US.
South Africa can maintain more than 98% of real value in the economy by limiting inflation to a maximum of 2%. That is how the major part of the world economy maintains more than 97% of real value at the moment.
Money has three functions:
1. Medium of exchange
2. Store of value
3. Unit of account
A central bank can maintian more than 98% of all real value by keeping inflation at 2%. This is the result of money´s third function.
At expected 10% inflation the SARB is maintaining more than 90% of real value in the real economy. How much more is not known. 10% of M3 or R168 billion is definitely being destroyed in the monetary economy. None of this real loss is accounted in SA at the moment.
SA accountants destroy an unknow value running into the hundreds of billions of Rand in all constant real value non-monetary items never or not fully updated, eg. retained income.
The accounted part of the R168 billion destroyed in M3 would be taken to the profit and loss account as a net monetary loss. It is not presently done like that.
SA accountants currently destroy hundreds of billions of Rand in retained income real value and in all other constant values never of not fully updated each and every year. They are killing that part of the real economy. This is an unknown percentage lower than 10% per annum of the real economy. This destruction of real value only happens in constant real value non-monetary items never or not fully updated. Salaries and wages are not always fully updated, for example. The full 10% destruction only takes place in constant values never updated, eg. retained income.
That is one of SA´s structural problems. Another is the 3 to 6% inflation target. It should be targeted at an upper limit of 2% like in Europe and the US.
South Africa can maintain more than 98% of real value in the economy by limiting inflation to a maximum of 2%. That is how the major part of the world economy maintains more than 97% of real value at the moment.
Money has three functions:
1. Medium of exchange
2. Store of value
3. Unit of account
A central bank can maintian more than 98% of all real value by keeping inflation at 2%. This is the result of money´s third function.
At expected 10% inflation the SARB is maintaining more than 90% of real value in the real economy. How much more is not known. 10% of M3 or R168 billion is definitely being destroyed in the monetary economy. None of this real loss is accounted in SA at the moment.
SA accountants destroy an unknow value running into the hundreds of billions of Rand in all constant real value non-monetary items never or not fully updated, eg. retained income.
Three distinct economic items
There are three distinct economic items in the economy:
Buy the ebook for $2.99 or £1.53 or €2.68
1. Variable real value non-monetary items
2. Monetary items
3. Constant real value non-monetary items
They are valued in distinctly different ways.
Monetary items are money held and monetary values pertaining only to money.
Non-monetary items are all items that are not monetary items.
Non-monetary items are sub-divided into variable real value non-monetary items and constant real value non-monetary items. Constant real value non-monetary items only came about with the introduction of the double entry accounting model.
The first economies
The first economies functioned without money. They were barter economies. People bartered economic items they produced or possessed for other economic items they wanted.
Those economic items had variable values. A baker baking bread bartered her extra rolls of bread for rabbits that a hunter would barter. When the hunter had many rabbits to barter he would accept a certain number of bread rolls for a rabbit. When he had few rabbits to barter and he was the only hunter in that area, then he would trade the rabbits for more rolls of bread per rabbit.
Both the rabbits and the bread rolls thus had variable values depending on demand and supply. This applied to all economic items in those barter economies.
Neither money nor the double entry accounting model was invented yet. There was no inflation. There was no medium of exchange. There was no monetary unit of account. There were no financial reports: no profit and loss account and no balance sheet.
There were no monetary items and no constant real value non-monetary items. Only variable real value non-monetary items.
The first economic item was thus a variable real value non-monetary item.
People in barter economies used a primitive system of demand and supply at a specific location where the barter transaction took place.
Money
Money was then invented over a long period of time. Eventually money came to fulfil three functions:
a. Medium of exchange
b. Unit of account
c. Store of value
At that stage there were two distinct economic items in the economy: variable real value non-monetary items and monetary items. The double entry accounting model was not perfected yet
The second distinct economic item was a monetary item. Inflation appeared soon after money was invented.
Double Entry Accounting
Finally the double entry accounting model was invented. This resulted in the creation of the third distinct economic item: a constant real value non-monetary item.
Buy the ebook for $2.99 or £1.53 or €2.68
Buy the ebook for $2.99 or £1.53 or €2.68
1. Variable real value non-monetary items
2. Monetary items
3. Constant real value non-monetary items
They are valued in distinctly different ways.
Monetary items are money held and monetary values pertaining only to money.
Non-monetary items are all items that are not monetary items.
Non-monetary items are sub-divided into variable real value non-monetary items and constant real value non-monetary items. Constant real value non-monetary items only came about with the introduction of the double entry accounting model.
The first economies
The first economies functioned without money. They were barter economies. People bartered economic items they produced or possessed for other economic items they wanted.
Those economic items had variable values. A baker baking bread bartered her extra rolls of bread for rabbits that a hunter would barter. When the hunter had many rabbits to barter he would accept a certain number of bread rolls for a rabbit. When he had few rabbits to barter and he was the only hunter in that area, then he would trade the rabbits for more rolls of bread per rabbit.
Both the rabbits and the bread rolls thus had variable values depending on demand and supply. This applied to all economic items in those barter economies.
Neither money nor the double entry accounting model was invented yet. There was no inflation. There was no medium of exchange. There was no monetary unit of account. There were no financial reports: no profit and loss account and no balance sheet.
There were no monetary items and no constant real value non-monetary items. Only variable real value non-monetary items.
The first economic item was thus a variable real value non-monetary item.
People in barter economies used a primitive system of demand and supply at a specific location where the barter transaction took place.
Money
Money was then invented over a long period of time. Eventually money came to fulfil three functions:
a. Medium of exchange
b. Unit of account
c. Store of value
At that stage there were two distinct economic items in the economy: variable real value non-monetary items and monetary items. The double entry accounting model was not perfected yet
The second distinct economic item was a monetary item. Inflation appeared soon after money was invented.
Double Entry Accounting
Finally the double entry accounting model was invented. This resulted in the creation of the third distinct economic item: a constant real value non-monetary item.
Buy the ebook for $2.99 or £1.53 or €2.68
Equilibrium for Zimbabwe
Equilibrium for Zimbabwe will come about when Zimbabwe copies Brazil and implements a Zim non-monetary index unit or Zim Real Value Unit based on the proven and very successful Brazilian Unidade Real de Valor that allowed Brazil to have a stable and growing economy in non-monetary items which gave them time to sort out how to kill cash hyperinflation in their money.
This is not a theory. It is an historic fact. It was a proven and very successful practice implemented in the 180 million people Brazilian economy.
What is required in Zimbabwe are two elements: a stable non-monetary index unit and a daily rate between the ZimDollar and this stable Real Value Unit.
The Zim Real Value Unit already exists. It is the USDollar.
The USD is a monetary item and the Zim Real Value Unit has to be a non-monetary index. That is correct. It is also true that the USD is 2% away from being a 100% stable index unit. 2% is nothing in the current hyperinflationary chaos in Zimbabwe.
The USD is the Zim Real Value Unit. Every non-monetary item in Zim is given a USD price. That is done by dividing the current ZimDollar purchase price or valuation of any Zim non-monetary item by the current Real Value Unit rate. Or it is simply given a USD price.
Now a a single daily Zim Real Value Unit rate is needed.
That also exists. It is called the Old Mutual Implied Rate. There are many parallel rates in Zimbabwe every day. Everybody haggles to get his or her best rate for his or her deal. So there are many, many USD parallel rates. There is no single USD rate for the whole country because the ZimDollar is not yet floated by the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe.
The Old Mutual Implied Rate is calculated by dividing the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange price of the Old Mutual share by the London Stock Exchange Price for the same share. The answer is the Old Mutual Implied Rate for the Pound. Then a cross rate calculation is done for the USD rate.
That is the Old Mutual Implied Rate for the USD in Zimbabwe. A single rate is calculated by using the daily closing prices.That can be used as the single Real Value Unit Rate for the whole of Zimbabwe. There is no doubt about the daily closing rate when closing prices are used.
That is the equilibrium solution for Zimbabwe.
How will the OMIR be used for salaries. The worker and employer determine the salary in USD. Say USD 100 or USD 1000 or whatever the USD salary is. It will not change for a whole year in USD value.
Every time the salary is paid it is paid at that day´s OMIR. As prices go up the OMIR will go up and so will the salary. A worker will always receive the same salary in USD equivalent value.This way salaries and prices are linked.
This way all non-monetary items in the whole Zim economy are linked, just like with the Brazilian Unidade Real de Valor.
The Zim economy will return to being a stable economy in non-monetary items. Cash inflation will still depend on the strenght or weakness of the many underlying value systems in the Zim economy, namely the monetary system, economic system, banking system, government, justice system, education system, defence system, industrial policies and systems, etc, etc.
The Zim Real Value Unit will kill non-monetary inflation in all non-monetary items since they will all be valued at exactly the same Zim Real Value Unit rate.
The Zim economy will stabilise and the government and monetary authorities can work on the problems to kill cash hyperinflation in the ZimDollar.
This is not a theory. It is an historic fact. It was a proven and very successful practice implemented in the 180 million people Brazilian economy.
What is required in Zimbabwe are two elements: a stable non-monetary index unit and a daily rate between the ZimDollar and this stable Real Value Unit.
The Zim Real Value Unit already exists. It is the USDollar.
The USD is a monetary item and the Zim Real Value Unit has to be a non-monetary index. That is correct. It is also true that the USD is 2% away from being a 100% stable index unit. 2% is nothing in the current hyperinflationary chaos in Zimbabwe.
The USD is the Zim Real Value Unit. Every non-monetary item in Zim is given a USD price. That is done by dividing the current ZimDollar purchase price or valuation of any Zim non-monetary item by the current Real Value Unit rate. Or it is simply given a USD price.
Now a a single daily Zim Real Value Unit rate is needed.
That also exists. It is called the Old Mutual Implied Rate. There are many parallel rates in Zimbabwe every day. Everybody haggles to get his or her best rate for his or her deal. So there are many, many USD parallel rates. There is no single USD rate for the whole country because the ZimDollar is not yet floated by the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe.
The Old Mutual Implied Rate is calculated by dividing the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange price of the Old Mutual share by the London Stock Exchange Price for the same share. The answer is the Old Mutual Implied Rate for the Pound. Then a cross rate calculation is done for the USD rate.
That is the Old Mutual Implied Rate for the USD in Zimbabwe. A single rate is calculated by using the daily closing prices.That can be used as the single Real Value Unit Rate for the whole of Zimbabwe. There is no doubt about the daily closing rate when closing prices are used.
That is the equilibrium solution for Zimbabwe.
How will the OMIR be used for salaries. The worker and employer determine the salary in USD. Say USD 100 or USD 1000 or whatever the USD salary is. It will not change for a whole year in USD value.
Every time the salary is paid it is paid at that day´s OMIR. As prices go up the OMIR will go up and so will the salary. A worker will always receive the same salary in USD equivalent value.This way salaries and prices are linked.
This way all non-monetary items in the whole Zim economy are linked, just like with the Brazilian Unidade Real de Valor.
The Zim economy will return to being a stable economy in non-monetary items. Cash inflation will still depend on the strenght or weakness of the many underlying value systems in the Zim economy, namely the monetary system, economic system, banking system, government, justice system, education system, defence system, industrial policies and systems, etc, etc.
The Zim Real Value Unit will kill non-monetary inflation in all non-monetary items since they will all be valued at exactly the same Zim Real Value Unit rate.
The Zim economy will stabilise and the government and monetary authorities can work on the problems to kill cash hyperinflation in the ZimDollar.
Saturday 19 April 2008
A 2% month on month rise in inflation will lead to hyperinflation in SA in 3 yrs time.
The expected month on month rise in CPIX in South Africa is 1.2% for March, 2008.
A 2% month on month rise in inflation will lead to hyperinflation in SA in 3 years time.
Hyperinflation is defined by the International Accounting Standards Board as: "the cumulative inflation rate over three years is approaching, or exceeds, 100%."
Continuous 2% month on month inflation equals 26% inflation after 1 year and 100% cumulative inflation over three years.
Scary isn´t it?
Get SA accountants to stop the stable measuring unit assumption and high or hyperinflation will never be able to destroy the SA economy.
A 2% month on month rise in inflation will lead to hyperinflation in SA in 3 years time.
Hyperinflation is defined by the International Accounting Standards Board as: "the cumulative inflation rate over three years is approaching, or exceeds, 100%."
Continuous 2% month on month inflation equals 26% inflation after 1 year and 100% cumulative inflation over three years.
Scary isn´t it?
Get SA accountants to stop the stable measuring unit assumption and high or hyperinflation will never be able to destroy the SA economy.
Make the Zim experience impossible in SA
Make the destruction of the economy by high and hyperinflation impossible by banning SA accountants from assuming that money is PERFECTLY stable ONLY for the purpose of valuing CONSTANT value historical cost items, eg. retained income.
They will do it under hyperinflation because they are told to do that by the IASB.
They refuse to do it under non-hyperinflationary conditions because they are not told by the IASB to stop that silly assumption.
They will do it under hyperinflation because they are told to do that by the IASB.
They refuse to do it under non-hyperinflationary conditions because they are not told by the IASB to stop that silly assumption.
Killing the real economy
What SA needs is an inflation upper limit of 2% like the Euro. The inflation target of 3 to 6% is one of the main culprits of the current problems. Another is the 21% increase in money supply.
Young South Africans studying accounting at university are being taught to assume that there is no inflation as far as constant real value non-monetary items, eg. retained income, is concerned. As accounting students they will be taught that they have to assume that money is perfectly stable only for the purpose of valuing constant real value non-monetary items. When they become company accountants and do their companys´ accounts like that, they will be destroying their companys´ retained income as well as all other constant real value non-monetary items never updated at 9.8% per annum.
Since all accountants in SA are doing that they will be destroying hundreds of billions of Rand in retained income real value each and every year. They will be killing the real economy in SA as they are doing at present.
When they stop the stable measuring unit assumption they will be maintaining hundreds of billions of Rand of real value in the SA economy.
No-one can stop them from stopping the stable measuring unit assumption and maintaining the real economy instead of killing it.
Young South Africans studying accounting at university are being taught to assume that there is no inflation as far as constant real value non-monetary items, eg. retained income, is concerned. As accounting students they will be taught that they have to assume that money is perfectly stable only for the purpose of valuing constant real value non-monetary items. When they become company accountants and do their companys´ accounts like that, they will be destroying their companys´ retained income as well as all other constant real value non-monetary items never updated at 9.8% per annum.
Since all accountants in SA are doing that they will be destroying hundreds of billions of Rand in retained income real value each and every year. They will be killing the real economy in SA as they are doing at present.
When they stop the stable measuring unit assumption they will be maintaining hundreds of billions of Rand of real value in the SA economy.
No-one can stop them from stopping the stable measuring unit assumption and maintaining the real economy instead of killing it.
2% anchor for inflation
The SARB regards its primary goal in the South African economic system as " the achievement and maintenance of price stability".
Price stability is a year-on-year increase in the CPI of 0%.
A high degree of price stability is a year-on-year increase in the CPI of 2%.
The SARB has to change its primary goal in the South African economic system to be " the achievement and maintenance of a high degree of price stability of 2%".
Price stability is a year-on-year increase in the CPI of 0%.
A high degree of price stability is a year-on-year increase in the CPI of 2%.
The SARB has to change its primary goal in the South African economic system to be " the achievement and maintenance of a high degree of price stability of 2%".
Thursday 17 April 2008
0% Inflation only in constant real value non-monetary items
South Africa
Year-on-year inflation February 2008: 9.8%
Actual Historical Cost Paradigm: Assumes 0% inflation only for constant real value non-monetary items NEVER updated, eg. retained income, accumulated losses, trade debtors, trade creditors, capital reserves, provisions, etc., while actual inflation is 9.8%.
Some constant real value non-monetary items are often not fully updated, eg. salaries, wages, rents, fees, royalties, value added taxes, income taxes, company taxes, etc.
Basket of consumer goods
Feb 2007 R100
Feb 2008 R109.8
1. Monetary Inflation 9.8% per annum (destruction of real value of money and other monetary items)
2. Non-monetary inflation (destruction of real value in constant real value non-monetary items never or not fully updated)
(A) 9.8% per annum only for constant real value non-monetary items never updated.
(B) Less than 9.8% per annum for constant real value non-monetary items not fully updated.
1. Monetary Items M3 Value Destroyed
9.8% or R1.714692 trillion x 0.098 = R168.039 billion
2. Non-monetary Items Value Destroyed by South African accountants
(a)Constant real value non-monetary items never updated
Eg. Retained Income
Value Destroyed 9.8% or R???.??? billion x 0.098 = R??.??? billion
Plus 9.8% of all other constant real value non-monetary items never updated.
(b) Constant real value non-monetary items not fully updated
Eg. salaries, wages, rents, fees, royalties, value added taxes, income taxes, company taxes, etc.
Value Destroyed ?% or R???.??? billion x 0.0? = R??.??? billion
Total: A few hundred billion Rand per annum: each and every year.
=====================================================================================
Real Value Paradigm: All (past and present) constant real value non-monetary items fully updated all the time to the latest CPI value in low inflationary economies (the latest parallel rate or daily index rate in hyperinflationary economies).
Basket of consumer goods for the purpose of calculating monetary inflation:
Feb 07 R100 Monetary cost
Feb 08 R109.8 Monetary cost
1. Monetary inflation 9.8%
Monetary Items M3
Value Destroyed
9.8% or R1.714692 trillion x 0.098= R168.039 billion
2. Non-monetary inflation: impossible: no historical costs.
Non-monetary inflation: 0%
Constant real value non-monetary items updated at 9.8%
Basket of consumer goods for the purpose of "calculating" non-monetary inflation only in constant real value non-monetary items:
Feb 07 R109.8 (Historical values restated to Feb 08 CPI rate) Perceived value only possible at the current value base.
Feb 08 R109.8 ALL CONSTANT real value non-monetary items automatically updated/maintained/not destroyed in the normal business practice at the CPI rate: the current value base.
Value Destroyed
Zero - in all constant real value non-monetary items
Value to be maintained by SA accountants in the economy when they stop their assumption that money is perfectly stable only for the purpose of valuing constant real value non-monetary items. They are allowed to stop this assumption and they will stop this assumption under hyperinflation but not under non-hyperinflationary conditions.:
9.8% of retained income plus 9.8% of all other constant real values previously never updated plus value maintained in all other constant real value non-monetary items previously not fully updated.
Total: A few hunderd billion Rand per annum: each and every year.
PS. I plan to calculate some actual values for the SA economy.
Year-on-year inflation February 2008: 9.8%
Actual Historical Cost Paradigm: Assumes 0% inflation only for constant real value non-monetary items NEVER updated, eg. retained income, accumulated losses, trade debtors, trade creditors, capital reserves, provisions, etc., while actual inflation is 9.8%.
Some constant real value non-monetary items are often not fully updated, eg. salaries, wages, rents, fees, royalties, value added taxes, income taxes, company taxes, etc.
Basket of consumer goods
Feb 2007 R100
Feb 2008 R109.8
1. Monetary Inflation 9.8% per annum (destruction of real value of money and other monetary items)
2. Non-monetary inflation (destruction of real value in constant real value non-monetary items never or not fully updated)
(A) 9.8% per annum only for constant real value non-monetary items never updated.
(B) Less than 9.8% per annum for constant real value non-monetary items not fully updated.
1. Monetary Items M3 Value Destroyed
9.8% or R1.714692 trillion x 0.098 = R168.039 billion
2. Non-monetary Items Value Destroyed by South African accountants
(a)Constant real value non-monetary items never updated
Eg. Retained Income
Value Destroyed 9.8% or R???.??? billion x 0.098 = R??.??? billion
Plus 9.8% of all other constant real value non-monetary items never updated.
(b) Constant real value non-monetary items not fully updated
Eg. salaries, wages, rents, fees, royalties, value added taxes, income taxes, company taxes, etc.
Value Destroyed ?% or R???.??? billion x 0.0? = R??.??? billion
Total: A few hundred billion Rand per annum: each and every year.
=====================================================================================
Real Value Paradigm: All (past and present) constant real value non-monetary items fully updated all the time to the latest CPI value in low inflationary economies (the latest parallel rate or daily index rate in hyperinflationary economies).
Basket of consumer goods for the purpose of calculating monetary inflation:
Feb 07 R100 Monetary cost
Feb 08 R109.8 Monetary cost
1. Monetary inflation 9.8%
Monetary Items M3
Value Destroyed
9.8% or R1.714692 trillion x 0.098= R168.039 billion
2. Non-monetary inflation: impossible: no historical costs.
Non-monetary inflation: 0%
Constant real value non-monetary items updated at 9.8%
Basket of consumer goods for the purpose of "calculating" non-monetary inflation only in constant real value non-monetary items:
Feb 07 R109.8 (Historical values restated to Feb 08 CPI rate) Perceived value only possible at the current value base.
Feb 08 R109.8 ALL CONSTANT real value non-monetary items automatically updated/maintained/not destroyed in the normal business practice at the CPI rate: the current value base.
Value Destroyed
Zero - in all constant real value non-monetary items
Value to be maintained by SA accountants in the economy when they stop their assumption that money is perfectly stable only for the purpose of valuing constant real value non-monetary items. They are allowed to stop this assumption and they will stop this assumption under hyperinflation but not under non-hyperinflationary conditions.:
9.8% of retained income plus 9.8% of all other constant real values previously never updated plus value maintained in all other constant real value non-monetary items previously not fully updated.
Total: A few hunderd billion Rand per annum: each and every year.
PS. I plan to calculate some actual values for the SA economy.
Tuesday 15 April 2008
SA accountants destroy real value on a massive scale.
The real economy is being destroyed in the following manner: Accountants value VARIABLE real value non-monetary items correctly in terms of International Accounting Standards at market value or the lower of cost or realisable value or fair value or present value or recoverable value.
Unfortunately SA accountants assume that money is PERFECTLY stable ONLY for the purpose of valuing CONSTANT real value non-monetary items, eg. retained income. SA accountants thus destroy all CONSTANT real value non-monetary items NEVER updated, eg. retained income, at 9.8% per annum.
They also destroy some part (less than 9.8% per annum) of all other CONSTANT real value non-monetary items that are NOT FULLY updated, eg. salaries, wages, rent, fees, royalties, value added taxes, income taxes, company taxes, rates, issued share capital, etc.
When SA accountants stop their silly assumption that money is PERFECTLY stable ONLY for this single purpose, SA will have 0% inflation in all CONSTANT real value non-monetary items since they will all be updated at the monthly inflation rate.
SA accountants destroy real value on a massive scale. This is very easy to prove from company to company.
It is easy to stop too: just stop the stable measuring unit assumption, that is, stop assuming money is PERFECTLY stable ONLY for the purpose of valuing CONSTANT real value non-monetary items.
Unfortunately SA accountants assume that money is PERFECTLY stable ONLY for the purpose of valuing CONSTANT real value non-monetary items, eg. retained income. SA accountants thus destroy all CONSTANT real value non-monetary items NEVER updated, eg. retained income, at 9.8% per annum.
They also destroy some part (less than 9.8% per annum) of all other CONSTANT real value non-monetary items that are NOT FULLY updated, eg. salaries, wages, rent, fees, royalties, value added taxes, income taxes, company taxes, rates, issued share capital, etc.
When SA accountants stop their silly assumption that money is PERFECTLY stable ONLY for this single purpose, SA will have 0% inflation in all CONSTANT real value non-monetary items since they will all be updated at the monthly inflation rate.
SA accountants destroy real value on a massive scale. This is very easy to prove from company to company.
It is easy to stop too: just stop the stable measuring unit assumption, that is, stop assuming money is PERFECTLY stable ONLY for the purpose of valuing CONSTANT real value non-monetary items.
Saturday 12 April 2008
Cash economy and real economy
Monetary economy = everything that is actually money and monetary values. Monetary values are accounted monetary items, eg, bank balances, bank loans made and given, financial instruments (not shares), debt instruments, bonds, treasury bonds, home loans, etc.
Very simply stated: money
Real economy or non-monetary economy = everything else in the economy: everything that is not money.
Eg. Property, plant, equipment, shares, stocks in the warehouse, finished goods. Also items like retained income, companies´issued share capital, reserves and provisions on balance sheets, trade debtors, trade creditors, etc.
These non-monetary items are divided in two sub-groups:
1. Variable real value non-monetary items. Eg: Property, plant, equipment, shares, stocks in the warehouse, finished goods, all items for sale, etc.
These items are adequately valued in terms of International Accounting Standards, eg. at fair value, market value, the lower of cost or net realisable value, present value or recoverable value.
There is thus no value destroyed by the accounting or vauluation method. They are adequately valued. No value is destroyed.
2. Constant real value non-monetary items.
Examples: Retained income, issued share capital values, capital reserves, trade debtors, trade creditors, all expenses and all income items in the profit and loss account.
Constant real value non-monetary items came about when the double entry accounting model was introduced in 1300.
Without the double entry accounting model there are no constant real value non-monetary items.
Accountants understand that there is an economic process called inflation and that inflation destroys the real value of money and that money is not stable in real value in inflationary economies.
Money is an historical cost item that you cannot update. Thus, inflation destroys its real value all the time.
Accountants unfortunately, at the same time, ASSUME that money is PERFECTLY stable (no inflation) ONLY for the purpose of valuing CONSTANT real value non-monetary items, eg. retained income.
They thus do NOT update CONSTANT real value non-monetary items, eg. retained income.
Thus, the real value of constant real value non-monetary items never updated, eg. retained income, is also destroyed, just like money, at the rate of inflation.
Under Real Value Accounting this silly and illogical assumption that money is perfectly stable ONLY for the purpose of valuing constant real value non-monetary items is ignored.
All constant real value non-monetary items are updated every time the Consumer Price Index changes under Real Value Accounting in non-hyperinflationary economies. In hyperinflationary economies this is done every time the parallel rate or a daily index rate changes.
This results in 0% inflation ONLY in all CONSTANT real value non-monetary items in the real economy: that is, no value destruction ONLY in that part of the real economy.
Very simply stated: money
Real economy or non-monetary economy = everything else in the economy: everything that is not money.
Eg. Property, plant, equipment, shares, stocks in the warehouse, finished goods. Also items like retained income, companies´issued share capital, reserves and provisions on balance sheets, trade debtors, trade creditors, etc.
These non-monetary items are divided in two sub-groups:
1. Variable real value non-monetary items. Eg: Property, plant, equipment, shares, stocks in the warehouse, finished goods, all items for sale, etc.
These items are adequately valued in terms of International Accounting Standards, eg. at fair value, market value, the lower of cost or net realisable value, present value or recoverable value.
There is thus no value destroyed by the accounting or vauluation method. They are adequately valued. No value is destroyed.
2. Constant real value non-monetary items.
Examples: Retained income, issued share capital values, capital reserves, trade debtors, trade creditors, all expenses and all income items in the profit and loss account.
Constant real value non-monetary items came about when the double entry accounting model was introduced in 1300.
Without the double entry accounting model there are no constant real value non-monetary items.
Accountants understand that there is an economic process called inflation and that inflation destroys the real value of money and that money is not stable in real value in inflationary economies.
Money is an historical cost item that you cannot update. Thus, inflation destroys its real value all the time.
Accountants unfortunately, at the same time, ASSUME that money is PERFECTLY stable (no inflation) ONLY for the purpose of valuing CONSTANT real value non-monetary items, eg. retained income.
They thus do NOT update CONSTANT real value non-monetary items, eg. retained income.
Thus, the real value of constant real value non-monetary items never updated, eg. retained income, is also destroyed, just like money, at the rate of inflation.
Under Real Value Accounting this silly and illogical assumption that money is perfectly stable ONLY for the purpose of valuing constant real value non-monetary items is ignored.
All constant real value non-monetary items are updated every time the Consumer Price Index changes under Real Value Accounting in non-hyperinflationary economies. In hyperinflationary economies this is done every time the parallel rate or a daily index rate changes.
This results in 0% inflation ONLY in all CONSTANT real value non-monetary items in the real economy: that is, no value destruction ONLY in that part of the real economy.
Monday 7 April 2008
Constant real value non-monetary items defined in IFRS
The term constant real value non-monetary item is defined indirectly in IFRS.
Buy the ebook for $2.99 or £1.53 or €2.68
South African accountants are taught that there are only two distinct economic items in the economy, namely, monetary and non-monetary items and that the economy is divided in the monetary and non-monetary or real economy.
Monetary items are defined by the International Accounting Standards Board in IAS 29, Par. 12 as follows:
Monetary items are money held and items to be received or paid in money.
The second part of this definition is not correct. When you buy your mobile phone on credit, the trade debtor amount in the supplier´s accounts is not a monetary item just because it has to be paid in money. You can pay it in strawberries too, if the supplier will accept strawberries as payment. The trade debtor amount relates to the sale of a variable real value non-monetary item, namely your mobile phone. You did not borrow money from the supplier. The trade debt is a constant real value non-monetary item.
When inflation destroys the real value of your money at 15% per annum you have to pay 15% more money over a year to pay off the constant real value non-monetary item, the phone you bought. It is impossible for inflation to destroy the constant real non-monetary value of your phone as long as the real value of your phone is determined in a free market. Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon - as per Milton Friedman. Money is only the monetary medium of exchange used for payment. Inflation can only destroy the real value of money and other monetary items. Inflation has no effect on the real value of non-monetary items. The debt is for the constant real non-monetary value of a constant real value non-monetary item mutually agreed and generally accepted to be paid in money - not for a monetary item. Money is simply the medium of exchange. You did not borrow money. You bought a non-monetary item.
IAS 29 clearly defines monetary and non-monetary items as per the IASB.
Here follows the correct definition of Monetary items:
Monetary items are money held and items with an underlying monetary nature.
The above is not an IASB definition.
Non-monetary items are all items that are not monetary items. This IASB definition is correct for non-monetary items as a generic term. It is however taken that there are thus only two distinct items in the economy: monetary and non-monetary items. The standard to be applied in hyperinflationary economies, International Accounting Standard IAS 29 Financial Reporing in Hyperinflationary Economies was developed on this basis.
It is not true that there are only two basic economic items as defined by the IASB. There are three fundamentally different basic economic items in the economy:
1. Variable real value non-monetary items
2. Monetary items
3. Constant real value non-monetary items
Constant real value non-monetary items are currently only recognized by definition and by name under
(1) Constant Item Purchasing Power Accounting article on Wikipedia,
(2) on this blog and
The IASB does not recognize constant real value non-monetary items directly by name or by definition, but, indirectly by implication. The fact that certain non-monetary items have constant real non-monetary values is implied by the IASB approval of the Constant ITEM Purchasing Power Accounting model in the Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements Par. 104 (a):
"Financial capital maintenance can be measured in either nominal monetary units or units of constant purchasing power."
The IASB clearly defines issued share capital, capital reserves, retained earnings, all other items in shareholders´ equity, all items in the income statement, provisions, etc as non-monetary items. Since these non-monetary items can be measured in units of constant purchasing power they are obviously constant real value non-monetary items with constant real non-monetary values expressed in terms of a monetary unit of account over time.
Logic would thus imply and it is a fact that non-monetary items that are not measured in units of constant purchasing power during low inflation on a primary valuation basis but are valued in terms of specific IFRS at, for example, market value, fair value, recoverable value, net realisable value, present value, etc are not constant but variable real value non-monetary items, e.g. property, plant, equipment, shares, inventory, foreign exchange, etc.
Constant real value non-monetary items are also implied by the fact that the IASB states in the Framework that accountants can choose to implement a financial capital concept of invested purchasing power where under they choose to measure financial capital maintenance in units of constant purchasing power (the real value maintaining Constant ITEM Purchasing Power Accounting model) instead of in traditional Historical Cost nominal monetary units (the real value destroying Historical Cost Accounting Model).
Buy the ebook for $2.99 or £1.53 or €2.68
Kindest regards,
Nicolaas Smith
Buy the ebook for $2.99 or £1.53 or €2.68
South African accountants are taught that there are only two distinct economic items in the economy, namely, monetary and non-monetary items and that the economy is divided in the monetary and non-monetary or real economy.
Monetary items are defined by the International Accounting Standards Board in IAS 29, Par. 12 as follows:
Monetary items are money held and items to be received or paid in money.
The second part of this definition is not correct. When you buy your mobile phone on credit, the trade debtor amount in the supplier´s accounts is not a monetary item just because it has to be paid in money. You can pay it in strawberries too, if the supplier will accept strawberries as payment. The trade debtor amount relates to the sale of a variable real value non-monetary item, namely your mobile phone. You did not borrow money from the supplier. The trade debt is a constant real value non-monetary item.
When inflation destroys the real value of your money at 15% per annum you have to pay 15% more money over a year to pay off the constant real value non-monetary item, the phone you bought. It is impossible for inflation to destroy the constant real non-monetary value of your phone as long as the real value of your phone is determined in a free market. Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon - as per Milton Friedman. Money is only the monetary medium of exchange used for payment. Inflation can only destroy the real value of money and other monetary items. Inflation has no effect on the real value of non-monetary items. The debt is for the constant real non-monetary value of a constant real value non-monetary item mutually agreed and generally accepted to be paid in money - not for a monetary item. Money is simply the medium of exchange. You did not borrow money. You bought a non-monetary item.
IAS 29 clearly defines monetary and non-monetary items as per the IASB.
Here follows the correct definition of Monetary items:
Monetary items are money held and items with an underlying monetary nature.
The above is not an IASB definition.
Non-monetary items are all items that are not monetary items. This IASB definition is correct for non-monetary items as a generic term. It is however taken that there are thus only two distinct items in the economy: monetary and non-monetary items. The standard to be applied in hyperinflationary economies, International Accounting Standard IAS 29 Financial Reporing in Hyperinflationary Economies was developed on this basis.
It is not true that there are only two basic economic items as defined by the IASB. There are three fundamentally different basic economic items in the economy:
1. Variable real value non-monetary items
2. Monetary items
3. Constant real value non-monetary items
Constant real value non-monetary items are currently only recognized by definition and by name under
(1) Constant Item Purchasing Power Accounting article on Wikipedia,
(2) on this blog and
The IASB does not recognize constant real value non-monetary items directly by name or by definition, but, indirectly by implication. The fact that certain non-monetary items have constant real non-monetary values is implied by the IASB approval of the Constant ITEM Purchasing Power Accounting model in the Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements Par. 104 (a):
"Financial capital maintenance can be measured in either nominal monetary units or units of constant purchasing power."
The IASB clearly defines issued share capital, capital reserves, retained earnings, all other items in shareholders´ equity, all items in the income statement, provisions, etc as non-monetary items. Since these non-monetary items can be measured in units of constant purchasing power they are obviously constant real value non-monetary items with constant real non-monetary values expressed in terms of a monetary unit of account over time.
Logic would thus imply and it is a fact that non-monetary items that are not measured in units of constant purchasing power during low inflation on a primary valuation basis but are valued in terms of specific IFRS at, for example, market value, fair value, recoverable value, net realisable value, present value, etc are not constant but variable real value non-monetary items, e.g. property, plant, equipment, shares, inventory, foreign exchange, etc.
Constant real value non-monetary items are also implied by the fact that the IASB states in the Framework that accountants can choose to implement a financial capital concept of invested purchasing power where under they choose to measure financial capital maintenance in units of constant purchasing power (the real value maintaining Constant ITEM Purchasing Power Accounting model) instead of in traditional Historical Cost nominal monetary units (the real value destroying Historical Cost Accounting Model).
Buy the ebook for $2.99 or £1.53 or €2.68
Kindest regards,
Nicolaas Smith
Saturday 5 April 2008
Historical Costs and Constant Values
Historical costs, eg. money, retained income, salaries, issued share capital and taxes NEVER updated in non-hyperinflationary economies (Historical Cost Accounting) have constant nominal values while their real values are being destroyed at the rate of inflation.
This results in the destruction of hundreds of billions of Euros in real value in the world economy each and every year because of the use of the Historical Cost Accounting model. This is simply in constant real value non-monetary items.
Variable real value non-monetary items are adequately valued in terms of International Accounting Standards. Real value is not generally destroyed in variable real value non-monetary items under IAS rules. The Historical Cost Accounting model only destroys real value in constant real value non-monetary items NEVER updated; for example, retained income as well as all other constant real value non-monetary items not fully or never updated.
Unfortunately the International Accounting Standards Board does not recognise constant real value non-monetary items. It only recognises monetary and non-monetary items - the latter including Historical Cost items. The IASB in this way contributes to the destruction of hundreds of billions of Euros in, for example, the real value of retained income world wide each and every year.
Under hyperinflation Historical Cost Accounting can destroy a complete economy as happened to the Zimbabwean economy over the past 14 years of hyperinflation. Historical Cost Accounting has destroyed many other economies in the past during hyperinflation. Eg. Jugoslavia, Germany during their hyperinflationary years and others.
Brazil is the only country in the world that was not destroyed by hyperinflation (30 years of it: 1964 to 1994) because they used a DAILY index to update all non-monetary items DAILY. The International Monetary Fund refuses to see the importance of this. That is why there is little hope that the IMF can help Zimbabwe to quickly get back to a stable monetary unit and a stable real economy. Their economists and accountants are too blinded by Historical Cost Accounting.
Constant values
for example
retained income
salaries
issued share capital
taxes
have constant real values.
Under Real Value Accounting they are subject to 0% inflation
while their nominal values are updated everytime the Consumer Price Index changes in non-hyperinflationary economies.
In hyperinflationary economies their nominal values (as well as all other non-monetary items) are updated DAILY at a DAILY index rate or the parallel rate - in the absence of a daily rate - when Real Value Accounting is used as the basic accounting model.
This results in the destruction of hundreds of billions of Euros in real value in the world economy each and every year because of the use of the Historical Cost Accounting model. This is simply in constant real value non-monetary items.
Variable real value non-monetary items are adequately valued in terms of International Accounting Standards. Real value is not generally destroyed in variable real value non-monetary items under IAS rules. The Historical Cost Accounting model only destroys real value in constant real value non-monetary items NEVER updated; for example, retained income as well as all other constant real value non-monetary items not fully or never updated.
Unfortunately the International Accounting Standards Board does not recognise constant real value non-monetary items. It only recognises monetary and non-monetary items - the latter including Historical Cost items. The IASB in this way contributes to the destruction of hundreds of billions of Euros in, for example, the real value of retained income world wide each and every year.
Under hyperinflation Historical Cost Accounting can destroy a complete economy as happened to the Zimbabwean economy over the past 14 years of hyperinflation. Historical Cost Accounting has destroyed many other economies in the past during hyperinflation. Eg. Jugoslavia, Germany during their hyperinflationary years and others.
Brazil is the only country in the world that was not destroyed by hyperinflation (30 years of it: 1964 to 1994) because they used a DAILY index to update all non-monetary items DAILY. The International Monetary Fund refuses to see the importance of this. That is why there is little hope that the IMF can help Zimbabwe to quickly get back to a stable monetary unit and a stable real economy. Their economists and accountants are too blinded by Historical Cost Accounting.
Constant values
for example
retained income
salaries
issued share capital
taxes
have constant real values.
Under Real Value Accounting they are subject to 0% inflation
while their nominal values are updated everytime the Consumer Price Index changes in non-hyperinflationary economies.
In hyperinflationary economies their nominal values (as well as all other non-monetary items) are updated DAILY at a DAILY index rate or the parallel rate - in the absence of a daily rate - when Real Value Accounting is used as the basic accounting model.
Wednesday 2 April 2008
Robert Mugabe beaten by inflation.
He tried to kill off the inflation dragon with price freezes.
It was useless.
He had to bow down to the inflation monster as was predicted all along.
Inflation has already toppled many goverments in the past. It can now add Robert Mugabe´s Zanu PF goverment to that long list.
Banning/revoking the stable measuring unit assumption will make the destruction of any economy by high inflation or hyperinflation impossible.
The stable measuring unit assumption is revoked under Real Value Accounting.
It was useless.
He had to bow down to the inflation monster as was predicted all along.
Inflation has already toppled many goverments in the past. It can now add Robert Mugabe´s Zanu PF goverment to that long list.
Banning/revoking the stable measuring unit assumption will make the destruction of any economy by high inflation or hyperinflation impossible.
The stable measuring unit assumption is revoked under Real Value Accounting.
Sunday 30 March 2008
Alan Greenspan´s definition of price stability.
2% Inflation is 98% stable value or 98% Real Value Accounting.
However, it will still destroy 51% of the value of money and constant values not updated over 35 years.
With the size of our economies today, 2% is a gigantic number.
Low or moderate 2% annual inflation is regarded as "price stability" by many entities including the European Central Bank.
"The ECB’s Governing Council has announced a quantitative definition of price stability:
"Price stability is defined as a year-on-year increase in the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) for the euro area of below 2%."
"The Governing Council has also clarified that, in the pursuit of price stability, it aims to maintain inflation rates below, but close to, 2% over the medium term."
Low or moderate continuous 2% annual inflation will destroy 51% of the real value of money and retained income as well as all other constant real value non-monetary items never updated over 35 years as any inflation calculator will demonstrate. Low or moderate 2% inflation being "price stability" is thus a very dubious definition.
Alan Greenspan´s definition of price stability is very accurate:
"Price stability obtains when economic agents no longer take account of the prospective change in the general price level in their economic decision-making."
Buy the ebook for $2.99 or £1.53 or €2.68
The annual destruction under low or moderate inflation of 2% of the real value of retained income of all companies with retained income world wide amounts to hundreds of billions of Euros (March 2008 value). That is a significant amount of unnecessary and easily avoidable real value destruction in the world economy each and every year.
2% inflation is a high degree of price stability. It is not actual price stability.
Price stability is a year-on-year increase in the Consumer Price Index of 0% as clearly indicated by Mr Greenspan´s definition.
0% cash inflation has never been achieved over a significant period of time.
Buy the ebook for $2.99 or £1.53 or €2.68
Real Value Accounting will result in 0% non-monetary inflation in the real (non-monetary) economy by simply ignoring accountants´ assumption that money is stable only for the purpose of valuing constant value items, eg. retained income.
However, it will still destroy 51% of the value of money and constant values not updated over 35 years.
With the size of our economies today, 2% is a gigantic number.
Low or moderate 2% annual inflation is regarded as "price stability" by many entities including the European Central Bank.
"The ECB’s Governing Council has announced a quantitative definition of price stability:
"Price stability is defined as a year-on-year increase in the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) for the euro area of below 2%."
"The Governing Council has also clarified that, in the pursuit of price stability, it aims to maintain inflation rates below, but close to, 2% over the medium term."
Low or moderate continuous 2% annual inflation will destroy 51% of the real value of money and retained income as well as all other constant real value non-monetary items never updated over 35 years as any inflation calculator will demonstrate. Low or moderate 2% inflation being "price stability" is thus a very dubious definition.
Alan Greenspan´s definition of price stability is very accurate:
"Price stability obtains when economic agents no longer take account of the prospective change in the general price level in their economic decision-making."
Buy the ebook for $2.99 or £1.53 or €2.68
The annual destruction under low or moderate inflation of 2% of the real value of retained income of all companies with retained income world wide amounts to hundreds of billions of Euros (March 2008 value). That is a significant amount of unnecessary and easily avoidable real value destruction in the world economy each and every year.
2% inflation is a high degree of price stability. It is not actual price stability.
Price stability is a year-on-year increase in the Consumer Price Index of 0% as clearly indicated by Mr Greenspan´s definition.
0% cash inflation has never been achieved over a significant period of time.
Buy the ebook for $2.99 or £1.53 or €2.68
Real Value Accounting will result in 0% non-monetary inflation in the real (non-monetary) economy by simply ignoring accountants´ assumption that money is stable only for the purpose of valuing constant value items, eg. retained income.
Thursday 27 March 2008
Accountants killing the real economy.
Tito Mboweni asked the following question: “Is there a danger that we are killing the real economy?”
Inflation always destroys real value in two ways: (1) Cash inflation destroys the real value of the Rand. (2) At the same time the combination of inflation and normal accounting destroys constant real value non-monetary items that are never updated, for example, retained income.
Accountants have good rules to value variable value items.
Unfortunately they assume that the destruction of the value of money has no effect on constant value items that are never updated (eg. retained income). They assume money is stable ONLY for this purpose. The above combination thus destroys the value of constant value items at the annual rate of inflation. This amounts to hundreds of billions of Euros in the world economy and probably hundreds of billions of Rand in the South African economy annually. It kills off quite a bit of the real economy each and every year as everyone in SA is experiencing at the moment - and all the more the higher inflation.
Hardly anyone in SA realises that SA accountants are responsible for killing the real economy.
This killing of the real economy will stop forever when accountants stop this assumption.
This will result in 0% inflation only in constant real value non-monetary items. There will still be cash inflation in SA. A person can avoid losing value under cash inflation by holding no cash; that is, rather buy things that keep their value with your money.
Companies as well as the SA government can order their accountants to stop this assumption immediately. Salaries, taxes and companies´ issued share capital values will be updated monthly. All other constant values too - including retained income.
This way of doing things is already possible, but, only under hyperinflation. The reason it does not currently work under hyperinflation is that the International Accounting Standard Board tells Zimbabwe to update non-monetary items annually (income statement items monthly as per PricewaterhouseCoopers) at the hyperinflation rate instead of telling them that they should update everything that is not money daily at the parallel rate or a daily index rate like Brazil did.
It is vital for SA to do this under low (2%) and high (9.8%) inflation on a monthly basis every time the Consumer Price Index changes (daily updating at a daily index or parallel rate under hyperinflation) to make it impossible for Chartered Accountants to kill the real economy - as they are doing at present.
References:
http://www.accountancysa.org.za/resources/ShowItemArticle.asp?ArticleId=1235&Issue=857
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_cost
© 2005-2010 by Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved
No reproduction without permission.
Inflation always destroys real value in two ways: (1) Cash inflation destroys the real value of the Rand. (2) At the same time the combination of inflation and normal accounting destroys constant real value non-monetary items that are never updated, for example, retained income.
Accountants have good rules to value variable value items.
Unfortunately they assume that the destruction of the value of money has no effect on constant value items that are never updated (eg. retained income). They assume money is stable ONLY for this purpose. The above combination thus destroys the value of constant value items at the annual rate of inflation. This amounts to hundreds of billions of Euros in the world economy and probably hundreds of billions of Rand in the South African economy annually. It kills off quite a bit of the real economy each and every year as everyone in SA is experiencing at the moment - and all the more the higher inflation.
Hardly anyone in SA realises that SA accountants are responsible for killing the real economy.
This killing of the real economy will stop forever when accountants stop this assumption.
This will result in 0% inflation only in constant real value non-monetary items. There will still be cash inflation in SA. A person can avoid losing value under cash inflation by holding no cash; that is, rather buy things that keep their value with your money.
Companies as well as the SA government can order their accountants to stop this assumption immediately. Salaries, taxes and companies´ issued share capital values will be updated monthly. All other constant values too - including retained income.
This way of doing things is already possible, but, only under hyperinflation. The reason it does not currently work under hyperinflation is that the International Accounting Standard Board tells Zimbabwe to update non-monetary items annually (income statement items monthly as per PricewaterhouseCoopers) at the hyperinflation rate instead of telling them that they should update everything that is not money daily at the parallel rate or a daily index rate like Brazil did.
It is vital for SA to do this under low (2%) and high (9.8%) inflation on a monthly basis every time the Consumer Price Index changes (daily updating at a daily index or parallel rate under hyperinflation) to make it impossible for Chartered Accountants to kill the real economy - as they are doing at present.
References:
http://www.accountancysa.org.za/resources/ShowItemArticle.asp?ArticleId=1235&Issue=857
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_cost
© 2005-2010 by Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved
No reproduction without permission.
Monday 24 March 2008
There are three different items in the economy
1. Money
2. Variable value items
3. Constant value items
The first economies only consisted of people and variable value items. Trade was by barter. Variable value items for variable value items.
Then money was invented.
Finally double entry accounting was introduced and constant value items came about.
Money´s value is being destroyed by cash inflation. Low inflation (2%) can reduce this destruction to a minimum. Monetary values more than 31 days old in low inflationary economies are all out of date/wrong.
Variable value items are adequately valued in markets and by International Accounting Standards/GAAPs. Variable values more than 31 days old in low inflationary economies are all out of date/wrong.
Constant value items are being destroyed by the combination of inflation and normal accounting. Ignoring/banning the assumption that money is stable will stop this destruction forever. Constant values more than 31 days old in low inflationary economies are all out of date/wrong.
All values and financial statements more than 31 days old in low inflationary economies are out of date/wrong.
All values in hyperinflationary economies are out of date/wrong at the next parallel rate. This can be from the one day to the next.
All constant value items never updated are destroyed at the inflation or parallel rate.
0% cash inflation which has never been achieved over any sustained period of time will make the real and monetary economy work at 0% inflation.
Stopping the assumption that money is stable which is Real Value Accounting and easy to implement will result in 0% inflation ONLY in CONSTANT real value non-monetary items.
References:
http://www.accountancysa.org.za/resources/ShowItemArticle.asp?ArticleId=1235&Issue=857
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_cost
2. Variable value items
3. Constant value items
The first economies only consisted of people and variable value items. Trade was by barter. Variable value items for variable value items.
Then money was invented.
Finally double entry accounting was introduced and constant value items came about.
Money´s value is being destroyed by cash inflation. Low inflation (2%) can reduce this destruction to a minimum. Monetary values more than 31 days old in low inflationary economies are all out of date/wrong.
Variable value items are adequately valued in markets and by International Accounting Standards/GAAPs. Variable values more than 31 days old in low inflationary economies are all out of date/wrong.
Constant value items are being destroyed by the combination of inflation and normal accounting. Ignoring/banning the assumption that money is stable will stop this destruction forever. Constant values more than 31 days old in low inflationary economies are all out of date/wrong.
All values and financial statements more than 31 days old in low inflationary economies are out of date/wrong.
All values in hyperinflationary economies are out of date/wrong at the next parallel rate. This can be from the one day to the next.
All constant value items never updated are destroyed at the inflation or parallel rate.
0% cash inflation which has never been achieved over any sustained period of time will make the real and monetary economy work at 0% inflation.
Stopping the assumption that money is stable which is Real Value Accounting and easy to implement will result in 0% inflation ONLY in CONSTANT real value non-monetary items.
References:
http://www.accountancysa.org.za/resources/ShowItemArticle.asp?ArticleId=1235&Issue=857
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_cost
Sunday 23 March 2008
The historical cost accounting model destroys real value on a massive scale in the world economy.
Updated on 20 January 2012
Buy the ebook for $2.99 or £1.53 or €2.68
This a verbatim copy of the my article Financial Statements, Inflation & The Audit Report published in Accounting SA, the accounting journal of the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants in September 2007.
I do not use the provocative style I used in 2008 any more. But, I prefer to maintain the original article heading as this blog is a chronological history of the development of the Constant Item Purchasing Accounting model.
This Accounting SA article is the first publication in a peer reviewed accounting journal where the terms constant real value non-monetary item and variable real value non-monetary item appeared.
Obviously, there is no such thing as Historical Cost Inflation as I used the term in this article. Inflation has only one component: a monetary component. This is, however, all part of the historical developement of Constant Item Purchasing Power Accounting that started in 1995 in Angola´s hyperinflationary economy.
In 2008 I still believed, like most people today still believe, that inflation affects the real value of non-monetary items. Inflation has no effect on the real value of non-monetary items. The stable measuring unit assumption affects the real value of constant real value non-monetary items never maintained constant.
"In most countries, primary financial statements are prepared on the historical cost basis of accounting without regard either to changes in the general level of prices or to increases in specific prices of assets held, except to the extent that property, plant and equipment and investments may be revalued."¹
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) only recognises two economic items:
1.) Monetary items defined as "money held and items to be received
or paid in money;" and
2.) Non-monetary items: All items that are not monetary items.
Non-monetary items include variable real value non-monetary items valued, for example, at fair value, market value, present value, net realisable value or recoverable value.
They also include Historical Cost items based on the stable measuring unit assumption.
One of the basic principles in accounting is "The Measuring Unit principle: The unit of measures in accounting shall be the base money unit of the most relevant currency.
This principle also assumes the unit of measure is stable; that is, changes in its general purchasing power are not considered sufficiently important to require adjustments to the basic financial statements."2
This makes these Historical Cost items equal to monetary items in the case of companies´ Retained Income balances and the issued share capital values of companies with no well located and well maintained land and/or buildings or other variable real value non-monetary items able to be revalued at least equal to the original real value of each contribution of issued share capital.
Retained Income is a constant real value non-monetary item valued at Historical Cost which makes it subject to the destruction of its real value by cash inflation - exactly the same as in cash.
It is an undeniable fact that South Africa's functional currency's internal real value is constantly being destroyed by cash inflation in the case of our low inflationary economy, but this is not considered important enough to adjust the real values of constant real value non-monetary items in the financial statements - the universal stable measuring unit assumption.
The combination of the Historical Cost Accounting model and low inflation is thus indirectly responsible for the destruction of the real value of Retained Income equal to the annual average value of Retained Income times the average annual rate of inflation. This value is easy to calculate in the case of each and very company in South Africa with Retained Income. It is also possible to calculate this value for all companies in the world economy with Retained Income.
It is broadly known that the destruction of the internal real value of the monetary unit of account is a very important matter and that inflation thus destroys the real value of all variable real value non-monetary items when they are not valued at fair value, market value, present value, net realisable value or recoverable value.
But, everybody suddenly agrees, in the same breath, that for the purpose of valuing Retained Income - a constant real value non-monetary item - the change in the real value of money is not regarded as important to update the value of Retained Income in the financial statements. Everybody suddenly then agrees to destroy hundreds of billions of Dollars in real value in all companies´ Retained Income balances all around the world.
Yes, inflation is very important!
All central banks and thousands of economists and commentators spend huge amounts of time on the matter. Thousands of books are available on the matter. Financial newspapers and economics journals dedicate thousands of columns to the fight against inflation.
But, when it comes to constant real value non-monetary items, it doesn't seem as if inflation is important. We happily destroy hundreds of billions of Dollars in Retained Income real value year in year out.
However, when you are operating in an economy with hyperinflation (perhaps only Zimbabwe at the moment with 3 713% inflation), then we all agree that you have to update everything in terms of International Accounting Standard IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies. You have to update variable AND constant real value non-monetary items.
But, ONLY as long as your annual inflation rate has been 26% for three years in a row adding up to 100% - the rate required for the implementation of IAS 29.
Once you are not in hyperinflation anymore, for example, 15% annual inflation for as many years as you want, then you are not allowed to update constant real value non-monetary items any more. Then you must destroy their real value again - at 15% per annum. Or 7.0% per annum in the case South Africa (April 2007).
For example:
Shareholder value permanently destroyed by the implementation of the Historical Cost Accounting model in Exxon Mobil's Retained Income during 2005 exceeded $4.7bn for the first time. This compares to the $4.5bn shareholder real value permanently destroyed in 2004 in this manner. (Dec 2005 values).
The application by BP, the global energy and petrochemical company, of the stable measuring unit assumption in the accounting of their Retained Income resulted in the destruction of at least $1.3bn of shareholder value during 2005. (Dec 2005 values).
Royal Dutch Shell Plc, a global group of energy and petrochemical companies, permanently destroyed $2.974 billion of shareholder value during 2005 as a result of the application of the stable measuring unit assumption in the accounting of their Retained Income. (Dec 2005 values).
Should this value be reflected in the financial statements?
Maybe it should.
Footnotes
¹ International Accounting Standards Committee, (1995), International Accounting Standard 1995, London, IASC, Page 502
http://www.accountancysa.org.za/resources/ShowItemArticle.asp?ArticleId=1235&Issue=857
² Paul H. Walgenbach, Norman E. Dittrich and Ernest I. Hanson, (1973), Financial Accounting, New York: Harcourt Brace Javonovich, Inc. Page 429.
Buy the ebook for $2.99 or £1.53 or €2.68
Saturday 22 March 2008
Implied authorisation by the IASB to revoke the stable measuring unit assumption in low inflationary economies.
Paragraph 40 of IAS 29 can be taken as revoking the stable measuring unit assumption in low inflationary economies as the word inflation is used instead of hyperinflation.
"Par 40 The disclosures required by this Standard are needed to make clear the basis of dealing with the effects of inflation in the financial statements."
Authorisation to revoke the stable measuring unit assumption in low inflationary economies can also be taken to be implied from the IASB´s Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements, Concepts of Capital Maintenance and the Determination of Profit:
Par 104. The concepts of capital in paragraph 102 give rise to the following concepts of capital maintenance:
(a) Financial capital maintenance.
Under this concept a profit is earned only if the financial (or money) amount of the net assets at the end of the period exceeds the financial (or money) amount of net assets at the beginning of the period, after excluding any distributions to, and contributions from, owners during the period. Financial capital maintenance can be measured in either nominal monetary units or units of constant purchasing power.
Units of constant purchasing power is generally taken as updating constant real value non-monetary items in terms of the monthly change in the Consumer Price Index in low inflationary economies and daily at a daily index rate (see Unidade Real de Valor: "The exchange rate of URVs to cruzeiros reais was recalculated and published daily by the government.") or the parallel exchange rate (in the absence of a daily index rate) in hyperinflationary economies (See Hyperinflation).
"Par 40 The disclosures required by this Standard are needed to make clear the basis of dealing with the effects of inflation in the financial statements."
Authorisation to revoke the stable measuring unit assumption in low inflationary economies can also be taken to be implied from the IASB´s Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements, Concepts of Capital Maintenance and the Determination of Profit:
Par 104. The concepts of capital in paragraph 102 give rise to the following concepts of capital maintenance:
(a) Financial capital maintenance.
Under this concept a profit is earned only if the financial (or money) amount of the net assets at the end of the period exceeds the financial (or money) amount of net assets at the beginning of the period, after excluding any distributions to, and contributions from, owners during the period. Financial capital maintenance can be measured in either nominal monetary units or units of constant purchasing power.
Units of constant purchasing power is generally taken as updating constant real value non-monetary items in terms of the monthly change in the Consumer Price Index in low inflationary economies and daily at a daily index rate (see Unidade Real de Valor: "The exchange rate of URVs to cruzeiros reais was recalculated and published daily by the government.") or the parallel exchange rate (in the absence of a daily index rate) in hyperinflationary economies (See Hyperinflation).
Historical Cost Accounting destroying hundreds of billions of Dollars of real value in the world economy year in year out.
The application of the historical cost principle by the accounting profession results in the destruction of "hundreds of billions of dollars in retained income real value year in year out" [5] - as well as in all other constant real value non-monetary items never or not fully updated throughout the world economy.
This can be stopped by the revoking of the stable measuring unit assumption. This has been authorised by the International Accounting Standards Board in International Accounting Standard IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies.
"Par 8 The financial statements of an entity whose functional currency is the currency of a hyperinflationary economy, whether they are based on a historical cost approach or a current cost approach, shall be stated in terms of the measuring unit current at the balance sheet date.
Par 11 Balance sheet amounts not already expressed in terms of the measuring unit current at the balance sheet date are restated by applying a general price index.
Income statement
Par 26 This Standard requires that all items in the income statement are expressed in terms of the measuring unit current at the balance sheet date. Therefore all amounts need to be restated by applying the change in the general price index from the dates when the items of income and expenses were initially recorded in the financial statements."
Paragraph 40 can be taken as revoking the stable measuring unit assumption in low inflationary economies as the word inflation is used instead of hyperinflation.
"Par 40 The disclosures required by this Standard are needed to make clear the basis of dealing with the effects of inflation in the financial statements."
Neither US GAAP nor the IASB allows the updating of constant real value non-monetary items, for example retained income, in low inflationary economies thus contributing to the destruction of "hundreds of billions of Dollars in real value in all companies´ Retained Income balances all around the world" [6] as well as in all constant real value non-monetary items never or not fully updated.
From: Wikipedia: Historical Cost: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_cost
This can be stopped by the revoking of the stable measuring unit assumption. This has been authorised by the International Accounting Standards Board in International Accounting Standard IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies.
"Par 8 The financial statements of an entity whose functional currency is the currency of a hyperinflationary economy, whether they are based on a historical cost approach or a current cost approach, shall be stated in terms of the measuring unit current at the balance sheet date.
Par 11 Balance sheet amounts not already expressed in terms of the measuring unit current at the balance sheet date are restated by applying a general price index.
Income statement
Par 26 This Standard requires that all items in the income statement are expressed in terms of the measuring unit current at the balance sheet date. Therefore all amounts need to be restated by applying the change in the general price index from the dates when the items of income and expenses were initially recorded in the financial statements."
Paragraph 40 can be taken as revoking the stable measuring unit assumption in low inflationary economies as the word inflation is used instead of hyperinflation.
"Par 40 The disclosures required by this Standard are needed to make clear the basis of dealing with the effects of inflation in the financial statements."
Neither US GAAP nor the IASB allows the updating of constant real value non-monetary items, for example retained income, in low inflationary economies thus contributing to the destruction of "hundreds of billions of Dollars in real value in all companies´ Retained Income balances all around the world" [6] as well as in all constant real value non-monetary items never or not fully updated.
From: Wikipedia: Historical Cost: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_cost
Friday 21 March 2008
Historical Cost
In historical cost accounting, historical cost is the original monetary value of an economic item.
When an historical cost item, for example money or retained income, is never updated its real value is destroyed at the rate of inflation in low inflationary economies. Money cannot be updated. Retained income is currently not updated in low inflationary economies as a result of the application of the stable measuring unit assumption. Retained income is:
The accumulated net income retained for reinvestment in a business, rather than being paid out in dividends to stockholders.
One of the basic principles in accounting is:
“The Measuring Unit principle: The unit of measure in accounting shall be the base money unit of the most relevant currency. This principle also assumes the unit of measure is stable; that is, changes in its general purchasing power are not considered sufficiently important to require adjustments to the basic financial statements.” .
The combination of the historical cost accounting model and low inflation is thus indirectly responsible for the destruction of the real value of retained income equal to the annual average value of retained income times the average annual rate of inflation.
From Wikipedia: Historical Cost: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_cost
When an historical cost item, for example money or retained income, is never updated its real value is destroyed at the rate of inflation in low inflationary economies. Money cannot be updated. Retained income is currently not updated in low inflationary economies as a result of the application of the stable measuring unit assumption. Retained income is:
The accumulated net income retained for reinvestment in a business, rather than being paid out in dividends to stockholders.
One of the basic principles in accounting is:
“The Measuring Unit principle: The unit of measure in accounting shall be the base money unit of the most relevant currency. This principle also assumes the unit of measure is stable; that is, changes in its general purchasing power are not considered sufficiently important to require adjustments to the basic financial statements.” .
The combination of the historical cost accounting model and low inflation is thus indirectly responsible for the destruction of the real value of retained income equal to the annual average value of retained income times the average annual rate of inflation.
From Wikipedia: Historical Cost: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_cost
Thursday 20 March 2008
What is the real value of money?
The real value of money within an economy or monetary union is determined by all the underlying value systems within that economy or monetary union.
The daily changes in the real value of money are determined by the daily changes in the rate of inflation or hyperinflation or deflation as indicated by the Daily CPI.
Daily indexing of all monetary items within the banking system in terms of the Daily CPI eliminates the EFFECT of inflation, hyperinflation or deflation within an economy or monetary union. It does nothing immediately to inflation, hyperinflation or deflation.
Daily indexing of all constant real value non-monetary items in terms of the Daily CPI removes the EFFECT of the stable measuring unit assumption within an economy implementing the nominal Historical Cost paradigm during inflation, hyperinflation and deflation.
Variable real value non-monetary items´ real values are determined in terms of fair value - generally in free and open markets. Daily indexing of these values in terms of the Daily CPI between fair valuing them in the market keeps their real values up to date with daily changes in the general price level.
Updated on 29 May 2016
Buy the ebook.
Copyright (c) 2012 Nicolaas Smith
The daily changes in the real value of money are determined by the daily changes in the rate of inflation or hyperinflation or deflation as indicated by the Daily CPI.
Daily indexing of all monetary items within the banking system in terms of the Daily CPI eliminates the EFFECT of inflation, hyperinflation or deflation within an economy or monetary union. It does nothing immediately to inflation, hyperinflation or deflation.
Daily indexing of all constant real value non-monetary items in terms of the Daily CPI removes the EFFECT of the stable measuring unit assumption within an economy implementing the nominal Historical Cost paradigm during inflation, hyperinflation and deflation.
Variable real value non-monetary items´ real values are determined in terms of fair value - generally in free and open markets. Daily indexing of these values in terms of the Daily CPI between fair valuing them in the market keeps their real values up to date with daily changes in the general price level.
Updated on 29 May 2016
Buy the ebook.
Copyright (c) 2012 Nicolaas Smith
Wednesday 19 March 2008
What is real value?
Real value is what you can sell things for right now. That means, someone is willing to buy them from you for a specific value payable immediately.
There are three basic things in the economy:
1. Things that have changing real values.
2. Money.
3. Things that have constant real values.
We express these values in money terms. Everything has a money value but that does not mean it is money because be buy and sell it in money terms and we use money to pay for things. Only money is money.
The real values of things you do not own are the market values of those things right now.
The above real values change all the time as the supply and demand for these things change.
The above relate to the real values of things that have changing real values.
There are two more basic things in the economy: money and things that have constant real values.
We will look at money´s real value in the next post.
There are three basic things in the economy:
1. Things that have changing real values.
2. Money.
3. Things that have constant real values.
We express these values in money terms. Everything has a money value but that does not mean it is money because be buy and sell it in money terms and we use money to pay for things. Only money is money.
The real values of things you do not own are the market values of those things right now.
The above real values change all the time as the supply and demand for these things change.
The above relate to the real values of things that have changing real values.
There are two more basic things in the economy: money and things that have constant real values.
We will look at money´s real value in the next post.
Saturday 15 March 2008
The difference between price increases and inflation.
Very few people understand the difference between inflation and a price increase. Inflation is an increase in the general price level. A price increase is the increase of any single price.
Buy the ebook.
Copyright (c) 2012 Nicolaas Smith
Buy the ebook.
Copyright (c) 2012 Nicolaas Smith
Thursday 13 March 2008
Business confidence will increase if South Africa revokes the stable measuring unit assumption.
BusinessDay reports that business confidence is the lowest in seven years.
Business confidence in South Africa will increase considerably if accountants and the accounting faculties of SA universities get together to develop a plan to revoke the stable measuring unit assumption in the South African economy.
Businesses and workers will then know that as soon as the accountants in South Africa revoke the stable measuring unit assumption no more real value will be destroyed in the real value of constant real value non-monetary items never updated in the SA economy.
Salaries, capital, taxes, income and expenses will be updated monthly at the new Consumer Price Index value.
The South African non-monetary economy will operate at 0% inflation since all constant real value non-monetary items will be updated.
Cash inflation will still destroy the value of the Rand and all other monetary items.
Hold no cash and monetary items and you can avoid the destruction of real value in monetary items.
Revoking the stable measuring unit assumption will make the destruction of real value in the non-monetary economy impossible.
Business confidence will surge in SA when everyone knows that what is happening in Zimbabwe now will forever be impossible in South Africa as long as the stable measuring unit assumption is revoked.
© 2005-2010 by Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved
No reproduction without permission.
Business confidence in South Africa will increase considerably if accountants and the accounting faculties of SA universities get together to develop a plan to revoke the stable measuring unit assumption in the South African economy.
Businesses and workers will then know that as soon as the accountants in South Africa revoke the stable measuring unit assumption no more real value will be destroyed in the real value of constant real value non-monetary items never updated in the SA economy.
Salaries, capital, taxes, income and expenses will be updated monthly at the new Consumer Price Index value.
The South African non-monetary economy will operate at 0% inflation since all constant real value non-monetary items will be updated.
Cash inflation will still destroy the value of the Rand and all other monetary items.
Hold no cash and monetary items and you can avoid the destruction of real value in monetary items.
Revoking the stable measuring unit assumption will make the destruction of real value in the non-monetary economy impossible.
Business confidence will surge in SA when everyone knows that what is happening in Zimbabwe now will forever be impossible in South Africa as long as the stable measuring unit assumption is revoked.
© 2005-2010 by Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved
No reproduction without permission.
Tuesday 11 March 2008
Poor Accounting
Unfortunately these black students are learning Historical Cost Accounting which includes the stable measuring unit assumption.
They will most probably never be taught that the combination of inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption annually destroys hundreds of billions of Rand of the real value of constant real value non-monetary items never updated in the South African economy. This include the real value of all Retained Income of all SA companies (listed and unlisted) which they will never be allowed to update as long as South Africa is not experiencing hyperinflation.
Most of them will most probably not even know anything about the stable measuring unit assumption as it is hardly ever mentioned in accounting lectures in South Africa. I wonder if the term even appears at all in any accounting textbook in South Africa.
This is very sad since it is exactly the combination of inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption as applied by Zimbabwean accountants that destroyed the Zimbabwean economy over the last 20 years of high and hyperinflation in that country.
I can foresee that the very same accountants may in the future help to destroy the SA economy when they apply the stable measuring unit assumption in the companies where they will be working or whose accounts they will be auditing. Just like it is now happening in Zimbabwe.
If they are taught that the combination of inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption is destroying hundreds of billions of Rands in the real value of all constant real value non-monetary items never updated (eg. retained income) in the SA economy annually and that by revoking it they can stop this destruction, they may have the guts to do that and to save the SA economy from the disaster that is currently happening in Zimbabwe.
© 2005-2010 by Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved
No reproduction without permission.
They will most probably never be taught that the combination of inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption annually destroys hundreds of billions of Rand of the real value of constant real value non-monetary items never updated in the South African economy. This include the real value of all Retained Income of all SA companies (listed and unlisted) which they will never be allowed to update as long as South Africa is not experiencing hyperinflation.
Most of them will most probably not even know anything about the stable measuring unit assumption as it is hardly ever mentioned in accounting lectures in South Africa. I wonder if the term even appears at all in any accounting textbook in South Africa.
This is very sad since it is exactly the combination of inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption as applied by Zimbabwean accountants that destroyed the Zimbabwean economy over the last 20 years of high and hyperinflation in that country.
I can foresee that the very same accountants may in the future help to destroy the SA economy when they apply the stable measuring unit assumption in the companies where they will be working or whose accounts they will be auditing. Just like it is now happening in Zimbabwe.
If they are taught that the combination of inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption is destroying hundreds of billions of Rands in the real value of all constant real value non-monetary items never updated (eg. retained income) in the SA economy annually and that by revoking it they can stop this destruction, they may have the guts to do that and to save the SA economy from the disaster that is currently happening in Zimbabwe.
© 2005-2010 by Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved
No reproduction without permission.
Monday 10 March 2008
Inflation´s destruction of the SA non-monetary economy can be stopped by SA accountants.
It was once generally accepted that the world was flat.
It is now generally accepted that Robert Mugabe´s policies destroyed the Zimbabwean economy.
In time people will come to understand that it was the combination of inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption that destroyed the Zimbabwean economy.
That same combination is currently destroying 9.4% per annum of all monetary items in South Africa as well as 9.4% per annum of the real value of Retained Income in all South African companies.
At continuous 9.4% per annum inflation all the real value of all Retained Income that remain in SA companies for the next 8 years will be completely destroyed. Today´s Retained Income balances will be there in 8 years time but they will be worth nothing - all else being equal.
When SA revokes the stable measuring unit assumption, this destruction of constant real value non-monetary items currently NEVER updated can be stopped.
Any SA company can revoke the stable measuring unit assumption and stop this destruction.
The International Accounting Standard Board authorised the updating of non-monetary items in IAS 29 in 1989.
If SA companies/accountants do not revoke the stable measuring unit assumption and inflation keeps on rising, then the combination of high inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption will definitely destroy the SA economy - exactly as it did in Zimbabwe over the last 14 years of hyperinflation in that country.
Three years of continuous 26% inflation is hyperinflation as defined by the IASB.
At the moment this destruction is taking place at 9.4% per annum. That means that the real value of all constant real value non-monetary items today that are never updated (eg. retained income) will see 100% of their real value destroyed over the next 8 years. The accounting values will still be in the books, but they will have zero real value - like the accounting values in Zimbabwean company accounts not updated.
It is now generally accepted that Robert Mugabe´s policies destroyed the Zimbabwean economy.
In time people will come to understand that it was the combination of inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption that destroyed the Zimbabwean economy.
That same combination is currently destroying 9.4% per annum of all monetary items in South Africa as well as 9.4% per annum of the real value of Retained Income in all South African companies.
At continuous 9.4% per annum inflation all the real value of all Retained Income that remain in SA companies for the next 8 years will be completely destroyed. Today´s Retained Income balances will be there in 8 years time but they will be worth nothing - all else being equal.
When SA revokes the stable measuring unit assumption, this destruction of constant real value non-monetary items currently NEVER updated can be stopped.
Any SA company can revoke the stable measuring unit assumption and stop this destruction.
The International Accounting Standard Board authorised the updating of non-monetary items in IAS 29 in 1989.
If SA companies/accountants do not revoke the stable measuring unit assumption and inflation keeps on rising, then the combination of high inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption will definitely destroy the SA economy - exactly as it did in Zimbabwe over the last 14 years of hyperinflation in that country.
Three years of continuous 26% inflation is hyperinflation as defined by the IASB.
At the moment this destruction is taking place at 9.4% per annum. That means that the real value of all constant real value non-monetary items today that are never updated (eg. retained income) will see 100% of their real value destroyed over the next 8 years. The accounting values will still be in the books, but they will have zero real value - like the accounting values in Zimbabwean company accounts not updated.
Friday 29 February 2008
If South Africa were a hyperinflationary economy ...
If SA were a hyperinflationary economy with continuous 26% inflation for three years in a row (the International Accounting Standards Board’s definition of hyperinflation) SA companies would implement International Accounting Standard IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies. Well behaving SA companies dutifully following useless (1) IASB requirements.
This would have no effect on hyperinflation in SA. IAS 29 is being applied in Zimbabwe since 2000 and is a complete and utter failure. The reason is that IAS 29 does not require DAILY updating of all non-monetary items as required under Real Value Accounting (2) but instead useless annual updating.
PricewaterhouseCoopers advocates equally useless monthly updating under hyperinflationary conditions.(3)
If SA were to copy Zimbabwe and were to follow the ineffectual IASB requirements and equally ineffectual PwC advice in this hypothetical hyperinflationary scenario, hyperinflation would destroy the SA economy in the same way it has been doing over the last 14 years of actual hyperinflation in Zimbabwe. SA companies would update commercial item prices daily (like in Zimbabwe ) but not salaries (like in Zimbabwe ) thus destroying the internal market very rapidly and destroying the whole economy equally rapidly.
If, on the other hand, SA, by chance, were to copy the very successful Brazilians in their 30 year (1964 to 1994) battle against hyperinflation and implement an Unidade Real de Valor (4) type of non-monetary index to update all non-monetary items (including salaries) DAILY under hyperinflation, the SA economy would keep on growing like in Brazil during hyperinflation.
Simply … because of DAILY updating of all non-monetary items under hyperinflation.
How singularly clever the Brazilians are.
If, in this hypothetical example, the South African Reserve Bank then were to manage to bring cash hyperinflation down to low levels again,
and if, by chance, all SA companies – which would have, by chance, come to understand the correctness of updating all non-monetary items DAILY (following the brilliant Brazilians) under hyperinflation -
then, by chance, stubbornly refuse to follow the very destructive and useless IASB requirement to go back to NOT updating all constant real value non-monetary items under LOW inflation, (the current state of affairs world wide)
SA would be the first country in the world to revoke the stable measuring unit assumption under LOW inflationary conditions.
This is something the accounting profession has been spectacularly unsuccessful in resolving for at least the last 100 years.
The stable measuring unit assumption is the silent, invisible destroyer of real value in all constant real value non-monetary items (eg. retained income) currently NEVER updated in all inflationary economies.
The IASB mandates you to update under hyperinflation, but then forbids you to update once you are back in low inflation thus supporting the destruction of hundreds of billions of US Dollars in real value in retained income world wide. Crazy and incomprehensible - but true.
One of the basic principles in accounting is “The Measuring Unit principle: The unit of measure in accounting shall be the base money unit of the most relevant currency.
This principle also assumes the unit of measure is stable; that is, changes in its general purchasing power are not considered sufficiently important to require adjustments to the basic financial statements.” (5)
If, on the other hand, we were to invert the above process and revoke the stable measuring unit assumption in SA in the very short term (not a snowball’s hope in hell),
it would be impossible in the very short term for the combination of low inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption ever more to destroy the real value of constant real value non-monetary items (eg. retained income) in SA.
This is happening at this very moment in all SA companies at the rate of 9.4% (Jan 2008 annual inflation rate) per annum equalling the destruction of hundreds of billions of Rands in retained income real value each and every year. Revoking the stable measuring unit assumption would maintain hundreds of billions of Rands of real value each and every year in the SA economy instead of annually destroying it.
It would also be impossible for hyperinflation ever to destroy the non-monetary economy in SA in the future - as long as we revoke the stable measuring unit assumption forever. We could still have Cash Hyperinflation (the one component of hyperinflation) but it would be impossible to have Historical Cost Accounting Hyperinflation - the second component of hyperinflation.
Simply … because of revoking ONE accounting assumption, namely, the stable measuring unit assumption.
How singularly clever we would be as a nation.
If …
Nicolaas Smith
realvalueaccounting@yahoo.com
(1) Useless in eliminating non-monetary inflation whereas daily updating of non-monetary items in a hyperinflationary economy does exactly that.
(2) Understanding IAS 29 PricewaterhouseCoopers.
(3) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unidade_real_de_valor
(4) Paul H. Walgenbach, Norman E. Dittrich and Ernest I. Hanson, (1973), Financial Accounting, New York : Harcourt Brace Javonovich, Inc. Page 429.
This would have no effect on hyperinflation in SA. IAS 29 is being applied in Zimbabwe since 2000 and is a complete and utter failure. The reason is that IAS 29 does not require DAILY updating of all non-monetary items as required under Real Value Accounting (2) but instead useless annual updating.
PricewaterhouseCoopers advocates equally useless monthly updating under hyperinflationary conditions.(3)
If SA were to copy Zimbabwe and were to follow the ineffectual IASB requirements and equally ineffectual PwC advice in this hypothetical hyperinflationary scenario, hyperinflation would destroy the SA economy in the same way it has been doing over the last 14 years of actual hyperinflation in Zimbabwe. SA companies would update commercial item prices daily (like in Zimbabwe ) but not salaries (like in Zimbabwe ) thus destroying the internal market very rapidly and destroying the whole economy equally rapidly.
If, on the other hand, SA, by chance, were to copy the very successful Brazilians in their 30 year (1964 to 1994) battle against hyperinflation and implement an Unidade Real de Valor (4) type of non-monetary index to update all non-monetary items (including salaries) DAILY under hyperinflation, the SA economy would keep on growing like in Brazil during hyperinflation.
Simply … because of DAILY updating of all non-monetary items under hyperinflation.
How singularly clever the Brazilians are.
If, in this hypothetical example, the South African Reserve Bank then were to manage to bring cash hyperinflation down to low levels again,
and if, by chance, all SA companies – which would have, by chance, come to understand the correctness of updating all non-monetary items DAILY (following the brilliant Brazilians) under hyperinflation -
then, by chance, stubbornly refuse to follow the very destructive and useless IASB requirement to go back to NOT updating all constant real value non-monetary items under LOW inflation, (the current state of affairs world wide)
SA would be the first country in the world to revoke the stable measuring unit assumption under LOW inflationary conditions.
This is something the accounting profession has been spectacularly unsuccessful in resolving for at least the last 100 years.
The stable measuring unit assumption is the silent, invisible destroyer of real value in all constant real value non-monetary items (eg. retained income) currently NEVER updated in all inflationary economies.
The IASB mandates you to update under hyperinflation, but then forbids you to update once you are back in low inflation thus supporting the destruction of hundreds of billions of US Dollars in real value in retained income world wide. Crazy and incomprehensible - but true.
One of the basic principles in accounting is “The Measuring Unit principle: The unit of measure in accounting shall be the base money unit of the most relevant currency.
This principle also assumes the unit of measure is stable; that is, changes in its general purchasing power are not considered sufficiently important to require adjustments to the basic financial statements.” (5)
If, on the other hand, we were to invert the above process and revoke the stable measuring unit assumption in SA in the very short term (not a snowball’s hope in hell),
it would be impossible in the very short term for the combination of low inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption ever more to destroy the real value of constant real value non-monetary items (eg. retained income) in SA.
This is happening at this very moment in all SA companies at the rate of 9.4% (Jan 2008 annual inflation rate) per annum equalling the destruction of hundreds of billions of Rands in retained income real value each and every year. Revoking the stable measuring unit assumption would maintain hundreds of billions of Rands of real value each and every year in the SA economy instead of annually destroying it.
It would also be impossible for hyperinflation ever to destroy the non-monetary economy in SA in the future - as long as we revoke the stable measuring unit assumption forever. We could still have Cash Hyperinflation (the one component of hyperinflation) but it would be impossible to have Historical Cost Accounting Hyperinflation - the second component of hyperinflation.
Simply … because of revoking ONE accounting assumption, namely, the stable measuring unit assumption.
How singularly clever we would be as a nation.
If …
Nicolaas Smith
realvalueaccounting@yahoo.com
(1) Useless in eliminating non-monetary inflation whereas daily updating of non-monetary items in a hyperinflationary economy does exactly that.
(2) Understanding IAS 29 PricewaterhouseCoopers.
(3) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unidade_real_de_valor
(4) Paul H. Walgenbach, Norman E. Dittrich and Ernest I. Hanson, (1973), Financial Accounting, New York : Harcourt Brace Javonovich, Inc. Page 429.
Saturday 23 February 2008
Dual Destruction of Real Value in the Economy.
Inflation always and everywhere results in the destruction of real value in
(A) all monetary items over time (which cannot be updated) and
(B) constant real value non-monetary items (historical cost items, eg. retained income) when the latter are NEVER updated as a result of the stable measuring unit assumption which is a generally accepted accounting principle or GAAP.
Retained income has never been and is never updated in economies that are not hyperinflationary economies under the current Historical Cost paradigm. Retained income is only updatable since 1989 in hyperinflationary economies in terms of International Accounting Standards IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies. IAS 29 does not require daily updating (as required under Real Value Accounting) and thus fails to have any effect in hyperinflationary economies.
A good example is the situation in Zimbabwe where IAS 29 is being applied without any effect on the state of the Zimbabwean economy. The International Accounting Standards Board´s IAS 29 is thus a complete and utter failure that serves no purpose at all and reduces the IASB´s credibility tremendously.
The IASB´s as well as the FASB´s credibility is even further diminished by the fact that they require the updating of all constant real value non-monetary items under hyperinflation but ban it under all other inflationary conditions thus supporting the annual destruction of hunderds of billions of US Dollars of real value in all companies´ retained income balances world wide in non-hyperinflationary economies.
(A) all monetary items over time (which cannot be updated) and
(B) constant real value non-monetary items (historical cost items, eg. retained income) when the latter are NEVER updated as a result of the stable measuring unit assumption which is a generally accepted accounting principle or GAAP.
Retained income has never been and is never updated in economies that are not hyperinflationary economies under the current Historical Cost paradigm. Retained income is only updatable since 1989 in hyperinflationary economies in terms of International Accounting Standards IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies. IAS 29 does not require daily updating (as required under Real Value Accounting) and thus fails to have any effect in hyperinflationary economies.
A good example is the situation in Zimbabwe where IAS 29 is being applied without any effect on the state of the Zimbabwean economy. The International Accounting Standards Board´s IAS 29 is thus a complete and utter failure that serves no purpose at all and reduces the IASB´s credibility tremendously.
The IASB´s as well as the FASB´s credibility is even further diminished by the fact that they require the updating of all constant real value non-monetary items under hyperinflation but ban it under all other inflationary conditions thus supporting the annual destruction of hunderds of billions of US Dollars of real value in all companies´ retained income balances world wide in non-hyperinflationary economies.
Wednesday 20 February 2008
Inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption are the two universal enemies.
Inflation IS the universal enemy as far as monetary items are concerned. Each one per cent rise in inflation instantaneously destroys more hunderds of billions of US Dollars in all monetary items throughout the whole economy. It is very difficult to arrive at zero per cent inflation. Two per cent inflation - defined incorrectly as "price stability" - destroys 51% of the real value of all monetary items over 35 years time.
The combination of inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption is the universal enemy as far as constant real value non-monetary items (historical cost items) NEVER updated (eg. retained income) are concerned. Each one per cent rise in inflation destroys even more hunderds of billions of US Dollars in the real value on constant real value non-monetary items NEVER updated each and every year on top of the hundreds of billions of US Dollars currently being destroyed each and every year by current inflation world wide.
Your contribution need not be deleted. The other side of the story need to be added.
You are only referring to one component of inflation, namely, cash inflation. What about the hunderds of billions of US Dollars destroyed each and every year in all companies´ retained income balances world wide in inflationary economies by the combination of inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption?
Revoke the stable measuring unit assumption (as mandated by the International Accounting Standards Board in IAS 29 in hyperinflationary economies) and you stop the second component of inflation forever. That is easy. It is simply an accounting procedure. Arriving at zero inflation is much more difficult to eliminate cash inflation.
Inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption are the two universal enemies
The combination of inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption is the universal enemy as far as constant real value non-monetary items (historical cost items) NEVER updated (eg. retained income) are concerned. Each one per cent rise in inflation destroys even more hunderds of billions of US Dollars in the real value on constant real value non-monetary items NEVER updated each and every year on top of the hundreds of billions of US Dollars currently being destroyed each and every year by current inflation world wide.
Your contribution need not be deleted. The other side of the story need to be added.
You are only referring to one component of inflation, namely, cash inflation. What about the hunderds of billions of US Dollars destroyed each and every year in all companies´ retained income balances world wide in inflationary economies by the combination of inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption?
Revoke the stable measuring unit assumption (as mandated by the International Accounting Standards Board in IAS 29 in hyperinflationary economies) and you stop the second component of inflation forever. That is easy. It is simply an accounting procedure. Arriving at zero inflation is much more difficult to eliminate cash inflation.
Inflation and the stable measuring unit assumption are the two universal enemies
Sunday 5 August 2007
Inflation Accounting
Inflation accounting describes an accounting model to be used during very high and hyperinflation. CIPPA is to be implemented at all levels of inflation and deflation.
Buy the ebook for $2.99 or £1.53 or €2.68.
Buy the ebook for $2.99 or £1.53 or €2.68.
Tuesday 24 July 2007
Quick Fix for Zimbabwe
Official Stabilization Plan
· Unify official and parallel exchange rates.
· Demonstrate commitment to greater fiscal responsibility.
· Scrap price controls
· Index unit to link non-monetary prices with official daily updates.
· Low new money supply growth.
Quik Fix
· Index unit (USD) to update non-monetary prices daily at the Old Mutual Implied Rate .
.
· Unify official and parallel exchange rates.
· Demonstrate commitment to greater fiscal responsibility.
· Scrap price controls
· Index unit to link non-monetary prices with official daily updates.
· Low new money supply growth.
Quik Fix
· Index unit (USD) to update non-monetary prices daily at the Old Mutual Implied Rate .
.
Tuesday 17 July 2007
Ink and a roll of paper is not real value.
The generally accepted notion in Zimbabwe that it is acceptable that a person can use ink and a roll of paper to collect US Dollars should stop as soon as possible for the best of the Zim people.
Not one ZimDollar of real value is created because it is economically and physically impossible to create real value like that.
No real value is created at all because it is not possible to create real value like that.It is simply a method to use power to use imperfections in the Zim market, not to create value, because that is impossible, but, to collect US Dollars in the parallel market.
That is not due process or acceptable in any economy. It is destroying whatever little bit of real value still exists in the Zim economy; that total of real transaction demand that is somehow represented by the total of ZimDollar notes in circulation.
That real transaction demand is finite now in Zimbabwe. Hardly any new real value is being created.The real transaction demand in real terms is finite.
Adding billions more pieces of paper to that total to collect USDollars in the parallel market, creates no new real Zim value, but, because the actual real Zim value is a finite, definite value, that finite real value has now to be divided amongst so many more billions pieces of paper.
Summary:
It creates not one ZimDollar in real value, but, it destroys millions of US Dollars in real value in the real value of existing ZimDollars in the country.
This process can - if carried on often enough - get to a point where all the real value of the ZimDollar is destroyed.
I cannot explain that final process or why it is like that. I do not yet understand that final step when all ZimDollars become worthless, but, I know from the Yugoslavia case, that it is possible.
I think Zim should stop with this process.
Maybe it would be better to follow the Brazilians and stabilise the Zim economy by stabilizing non-monetary values with a Zim Unidade Real de Valor or real value index unit.
Not one ZimDollar of real value is created because it is economically and physically impossible to create real value like that.
No real value is created at all because it is not possible to create real value like that.It is simply a method to use power to use imperfections in the Zim market, not to create value, because that is impossible, but, to collect US Dollars in the parallel market.
That is not due process or acceptable in any economy. It is destroying whatever little bit of real value still exists in the Zim economy; that total of real transaction demand that is somehow represented by the total of ZimDollar notes in circulation.
That real transaction demand is finite now in Zimbabwe. Hardly any new real value is being created.The real transaction demand in real terms is finite.
Adding billions more pieces of paper to that total to collect USDollars in the parallel market, creates no new real Zim value, but, because the actual real Zim value is a finite, definite value, that finite real value has now to be divided amongst so many more billions pieces of paper.
Summary:
It creates not one ZimDollar in real value, but, it destroys millions of US Dollars in real value in the real value of existing ZimDollars in the country.
This process can - if carried on often enough - get to a point where all the real value of the ZimDollar is destroyed.
I cannot explain that final process or why it is like that. I do not yet understand that final step when all ZimDollars become worthless, but, I know from the Yugoslavia case, that it is possible.
I think Zim should stop with this process.
Maybe it would be better to follow the Brazilians and stabilise the Zim economy by stabilizing non-monetary values with a Zim Unidade Real de Valor or real value index unit.
Saturday 14 July 2007
Equilibrium for Zimbabwe.
Equilibrium for Zimbabwe will come about when Zimbabwe copies Brazil and implements a Zim non-monetary index unit or Zim Real Value Unit based on the proven and very successful Brazilian Unidade Real de Valor that allowed Brazil to have a stable and growing economy in non-monetary items which gave them time to sort out how to kill cash hyperinflation in their money.
This is not a theory. It is an historic fact. It was a proven and very successful practice implemented in the 180 million people Brazilian economy.
What is required in Zimbabwe are two elements: a stable non-monetary index unit and a daily rate between the ZimDollar and this stable Real Value Unit.
The Zim Real Value Unit already exists. It is the USDollar.
The USD is a monetary item and the Zim Real Value Unit has to be a non-monetary index. That is correct. It is also true that the USD is 2% away from being a 100% stable index unit. 2% is nothing in the current hyperinflationary chaos in Zimbabwe.
The USD is the Zim Real Value Unit. Every non-monetary item in Zim is given a USD price. That is done by dividing the current ZimDollar purchase price or valuation of any Zim non-monetary item by the current Real Value Unit rate. Or it is simply given a USD price.
Now a a single daily Zim Real Value Unit rate is needed.
That also exists. It is called the Old Mutual Implied Rate. There are many parallel rates in Zimbabwe every day. Everybody haggles to get his or her best rate for his or her deal. So there are many, many USD parallel rates. There is no single USD rate for the whole country because the ZimDollar is not yet floated by the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe.
The Old Mutual Implied Rate is calculated by dividing the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange price of the Old Mutual share by the London Stock Exchange Price for the same share. The answer is the Old Mutual Implied Rate for the Pound. Then a cross rate calculation is done for the USD rate.
That is the Old Mutual Implied Rate for the USD in Zimbabwe. A single rate is calculated by using the daily closing prices.That can be used as the single Real Value Unit Rate for the whole of Zimbabwe. There is no doubt about the daily closing rate when closing prices are used.
That is the equilibrium solution for Zimbabwe.
How will the OMIR be used for salaries. The worker and employer determine the salary in USD. Say USD 100 or USD 1000 or whatever the USD salary is. It will not change for a whole year in USD value.
Every time the salary is paid it is paid at that day´s OMIR. As prices go up the OMIR will go up and so will the salary. A worker will always receive the same salary in USD equivalent value.This way salaries and prices are linked.
This way all non-monetary items in the whole Zim economy are linked, just like with the Brazilian Unidade Real de Valor.
The Zim economy will return to being a stable economy in non-monetary items. Cash inflation will still depend on the strenght or weakness of the many underlying value systems in the Zim economy, namely the monetary system, economic system, banking system, government, justice system, education system, defence system, industrial policies and systems, etc, etc.
The Zim Real Value Unit will kill non-monetary inflation in all non-monetary items since they will all be valued at exactly the same Zim Real Value Unit rate.
The Zim economy will stabilise and the government and monetary authorities can work on the problems to kill cash hyperinflation in the ZimDollar.
This is not a theory. It is an historic fact. It was a proven and very successful practice implemented in the 180 million people Brazilian economy.
What is required in Zimbabwe are two elements: a stable non-monetary index unit and a daily rate between the ZimDollar and this stable Real Value Unit.
The Zim Real Value Unit already exists. It is the USDollar.
The USD is a monetary item and the Zim Real Value Unit has to be a non-monetary index. That is correct. It is also true that the USD is 2% away from being a 100% stable index unit. 2% is nothing in the current hyperinflationary chaos in Zimbabwe.
The USD is the Zim Real Value Unit. Every non-monetary item in Zim is given a USD price. That is done by dividing the current ZimDollar purchase price or valuation of any Zim non-monetary item by the current Real Value Unit rate. Or it is simply given a USD price.
Now a a single daily Zim Real Value Unit rate is needed.
That also exists. It is called the Old Mutual Implied Rate. There are many parallel rates in Zimbabwe every day. Everybody haggles to get his or her best rate for his or her deal. So there are many, many USD parallel rates. There is no single USD rate for the whole country because the ZimDollar is not yet floated by the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe.
The Old Mutual Implied Rate is calculated by dividing the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange price of the Old Mutual share by the London Stock Exchange Price for the same share. The answer is the Old Mutual Implied Rate for the Pound. Then a cross rate calculation is done for the USD rate.
That is the Old Mutual Implied Rate for the USD in Zimbabwe. A single rate is calculated by using the daily closing prices.That can be used as the single Real Value Unit Rate for the whole of Zimbabwe. There is no doubt about the daily closing rate when closing prices are used.
That is the equilibrium solution for Zimbabwe.
How will the OMIR be used for salaries. The worker and employer determine the salary in USD. Say USD 100 or USD 1000 or whatever the USD salary is. It will not change for a whole year in USD value.
Every time the salary is paid it is paid at that day´s OMIR. As prices go up the OMIR will go up and so will the salary. A worker will always receive the same salary in USD equivalent value.This way salaries and prices are linked.
This way all non-monetary items in the whole Zim economy are linked, just like with the Brazilian Unidade Real de Valor.
The Zim economy will return to being a stable economy in non-monetary items. Cash inflation will still depend on the strenght or weakness of the many underlying value systems in the Zim economy, namely the monetary system, economic system, banking system, government, justice system, education system, defence system, industrial policies and systems, etc, etc.
The Zim Real Value Unit will kill non-monetary inflation in all non-monetary items since they will all be valued at exactly the same Zim Real Value Unit rate.
The Zim economy will stabilise and the government and monetary authorities can work on the problems to kill cash hyperinflation in the ZimDollar.
Financial Statements, Inflation and The Audit Report: Peer reviewed article published in Accountancy SA Sept 2007.
http://www.accountancysa.org.za/resources/ShowItemArticle.asp?ArticleId=1235&issue=857
“In most countries, primary financial statements are prepared on the historical cost basis of accounting without regard either to changes in the general level of prices or to increases in specific prices of assets held, except to the extent that property, plant and equipment and investments may be revalued.” ¹
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) only recognizes two economic items:
1.) Monetary items defined as “money held and items to be received or paid in money;” and
2.) Non-monetary items: All items that are not monetary items.
Non-monetary items include variable real value non-monetary items valued, for example, at fair value, market value, present value, net realizable value or recoverable value.
They also include Historical Cost items based on the stable measuring unit assumption.
One of the basic principles in accounting is “The Measuring Unit principle: The unit of measure in accounting shall be the base money unit of the most relevant currency.
This principle also assumes the unit of measure is stable; that is, changes in its general purchasing power are not considered sufficiently important to require adjustments to the basic financial statements.” ²
This makes these Historical Cost items equal to monetary items in the case of companies´ Retained Income balances and the issued share capital values of companies with no well located and well maintained land and/or buildings or other variable real value non-monetary items able to be revalued at least equal to the original real value of each contribution of issued share capital.
Retained Income is a constant real value non-monetary item valued at Historical Cost which makes it subject to the destruction of its real value by cash inflation – exactly the same as in cash.
It is an undeniable fact that South Africa’s functional currency’s internal real value is constantly being destroyed by cash inflation in the case of our low inflationary economy, but this is not considered important enough to adjust the real values of constant real value non-monetary items in the financial statements - the universal stable measuring unit assumption.
The combination of the Historical Cost Accounting model and low inflation is thus indirectly responsible for the destruction of the real value of Retained Income equal to the annual average value of Retained Income times the average annual rate of inflation. This value is easy to calculate in the case of each and very company in South Africa with Retained Income. It is also possible to calculate this value for all companies in the world economy with Retained Income.
It is broadly known that the destruction of the internal real value of the monetary unit of account is a very important matter and that inflation thus destroys the real value of all variable real value non-monetary items when they are not valued at fair value, market value, present value, net
realizable value or recoverable value.
But, everybody suddenly agrees, in the same breath, that for the purpose of valuing Retained Income - a constant real value non-monetary item - the change in the real value of money is not regarded as important to update the value of Retained Income in the financial statements. Everybody suddenly then agrees to destroy hundreds of billions of Dollars in real value in all companies´ Retained Income balances all around the world.
Yes, inflation is very important!
All central banks and thousands of economists and commentators spend huge amounts of time on the matter. Thousands of books are available on the matter. Financial newspapers and economics journals dedicate thousands of columns to the fight against inflation.
But, when it comes to constant real value non-monetary items, it doesn’t seem as if inflation is important. We happily destroy hundreds of billions of Dollars in Retained Income real value year in year out.
However, when you are operating in an economy with hyperinflation (perhaps only Zimbabwe at the moment with 3 713% inflation), then we all agree that you have to update everything in terms of International Accounting Standard IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies. You have to update variable AND constant real value non-monetary items.
But, ONLY as long as your annual inflation rate has been 26% for three years in a row adding up to 100% - the rate required for the implementation of IAS 29.
Once you are not in hyperinflation anymore, for example, 15% annual inflation for as many years as you want, then you are not allowed to update constant real value non-monetary items any more. Then you must destroy their real value again – at 15% per annum. Or 7.0% per annum in the case of South Africa (April 2007).
For example:
Shareholder value permanently destroyed by the implementation of the Historical Cost Accounting model in Exxon Mobil's Retained Income during 2005 exceeded $4.7bn for the first time. This compares to the $4.5bn shareholder real value permanently destroyed in 2004 in this manner. (Dec 2005 values).
The application by BP, the global energy and petrochemical company, of the stable measuring unit assumption in the accounting of their Retained Income resulted in the destruction of at least $1.3bn of shareholder value during 2005. (Dec 2005 values).
Royal Dutch Shell Plc, a global group of energy and petrochemical companies, permanently destroyed $2.974 billion of shareholder value during 2005 as a result of the application of the stable measuring unit assumption in the accounting of their Retained Income. (Dec 2005 values).
Should this value be reflected in the financial statements?
Maybe it should.
Nicolaas Smith
Footnotes
¹ International Accounting Standards Committee, (1995), International Accounting Standard 1995, London, IASC, Page 502
² Paul H. Walgenbach, Norman E. Dittrich and Ernest I. Hanson, (1973), Financial Accounting, New York: Harcourt Brace Javonovich, Inc. Page 429.
Thursday 12 July 2007
Real Value Unit to stabilise the economy on the way.
Most people realize that the situation in Zimbabwe is beyond politics at the moment. This cannot be left to go any further.
Brazil very successfully employed the Unidade Real de Valor. It is not a theory. It is a fact. It is not mine. I did not come up with it. It is a proven and very successful accounting practice used by Brazil and explained in Zimbabwe by the Brazilians to Zimababweans a few months ago.
Two items are required: a non-monetary index unit and a daily rate between that stable non-monetary index unit and the ZimDollar.
Zim already has the "stable" non-monetary index unit. It is the USD price of every non-monetary item in Zim.
I know the USD is a monetary item. I know.
The USD is 2% away from being a 100% stable non-monetary unit. I think that is acceptable in Zim´s current hyperinflationary chaos.
The fact that the USD is an immediately fully understandable and fully credible subsitute for a full non-monetary index makes it very acceptable in Zim.
So, the only item that needs to be generally agreed is the daily rate to be applied by everyone. I would suggest that it should be the Old Mutual Implied Rate for the USD in Zimbabwe. It is freely available to everyone every working day of the week. It is unambiguous and definite. The current rate can be used during the day with the closing price as the rate for the day. There is only one closing price. No ambiguity. One single price. Available to everyone everywhere with internet access.
Brazil very successfully employed the Unidade Real de Valor. It is not a theory. It is a fact. It is not mine. I did not come up with it. It is a proven and very successful accounting practice used by Brazil and explained in Zimbabwe by the Brazilians to Zimababweans a few months ago.
Two items are required: a non-monetary index unit and a daily rate between that stable non-monetary index unit and the ZimDollar.
Zim already has the "stable" non-monetary index unit. It is the USD price of every non-monetary item in Zim.
I know the USD is a monetary item. I know.
The USD is 2% away from being a 100% stable non-monetary unit. I think that is acceptable in Zim´s current hyperinflationary chaos.
The fact that the USD is an immediately fully understandable and fully credible subsitute for a full non-monetary index makes it very acceptable in Zim.
So, the only item that needs to be generally agreed is the daily rate to be applied by everyone. I would suggest that it should be the Old Mutual Implied Rate for the USD in Zimbabwe. It is freely available to everyone every working day of the week. It is unambiguous and definite. The current rate can be used during the day with the closing price as the rate for the day. There is only one closing price. No ambiguity. One single price. Available to everyone everywhere with internet access.
Peer Review by Head of Turkish International Accounting Standards Department of Real Value Accounting. r
Dear Mr. Smith,
As we have talked on the phone, you can find my interpretation about your book, attached to this e-mail.
Please do not hesitate to contact for any point.
Best regards,
Cemal KÜÇÜKSÖZEN, Ph.D.
Head of Accounting Standards Department
Capital Markets Board of Turkey
Dear Nick Smith,
I examined your book and understood that Real Value Accounting™ is based on the continuous updating of non-monetary units in terms of the Consumer Price Index to today’s real value.
Theoretically, I totally agree with you. But, as you know, there is a trend toward the acceptance of International Accounting Standards and International Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board all over the world. For example, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) recommends harmonization of national accounting standards with IAS and IFRS. Also, the European Union introduced the requirement that from 2005 onwards, all listed companies have to prepare their consolidated accounts in accordance with IAS and IFRS adopted for application within the European Community. Considering international developments and as a candidate country for full membership, Turkey has issued a communiqué involving all IAS and IFRS and began application of them from the beginning of 2005 (As you know, we began application of IAS 29 in 2003).
In this regard, we can change over to real value accounting when there is a change in IAS/IFRS toward real value accounting or there is a trend toward real value accounting all over the world.
Regarding to tax regulation, I want to emphasize that tax regulation required restatement of assets and liabilities according to inflation (in terms of IAS 29) for the date of 31.12.2003 but taxes were not taken according to restated values in 2003. In 2004, financial statements were restated and taxes were taken based on restated values. In 2005, tax authority declared that high inflation period has ended, so entities did not do restatement according to inflation in first, second and third quarter of 2005. At the end of 2005, both Board and tax authority will evaluate economic conditions again and decide whether there is a need to restatement according to inflation.
Lastly, you stated in your book “publicly held companies and capital market institutions must account for perhaps an estimated 80 percent of the Turkish economy”. Unfortunately, I couldn’t give such statistical information. Besides, I attached a file that includes information about market value of publicly held companies. As you can see in that file, total market value of publicly held companies is approximately $ 174.3 billion and market value of floating part is about $ 54 billion. Total portfolio value of the investment funds is about $ 20 billion where brokerage firms have an estimated market value of $ 2 billion.
On the other hand, I can say that when there is hyperinflation in terms of IAS 29, with some exceptions (small firms), most of the Turkish companies have to restate their assets and liabilities according to regulation of the CMB and the tax authorities.
Best regards.
Reviewed 12-04-16
Wednesday 11 July 2007
What Mugabe is looking for r
I am sure Mugabe will like the idea of linking salaries and prices with a Brazilian style Unidade Real de Valor non-monetary real value unit. He can see that salaries and prices have to be linked somehow. He is trying to link them by force.
He is getting the idea. He just does not know how to link them because his economic advisors forget about the fact that Brazil managed to do it. Mugabe wants to do it the way he knows. By force and by police action. He is actually trying to do something.
I think the only reason he does what he is doing is because he does not know about any other way. His advisors also seem to be too scared to stand up to him with the right solutions. He can feel that everybody just wants him to go. I think his advisors also do not have an aswer.
The Unidade de Valor Real is the solution. Someone just has to have the guts to stand toe to toe with Mugabe and tell him this to his face. It is the solution Mugabe is looking for. He must just understand it and then he can implement it. It will work.
Copyright 2007 Nicolaas Johannes Smith
Reviewed 12-04-16
He is getting the idea. He just does not know how to link them because his economic advisors forget about the fact that Brazil managed to do it. Mugabe wants to do it the way he knows. By force and by police action. He is actually trying to do something.
I think the only reason he does what he is doing is because he does not know about any other way. His advisors also seem to be too scared to stand up to him with the right solutions. He can feel that everybody just wants him to go. I think his advisors also do not have an aswer.
The Unidade de Valor Real is the solution. Someone just has to have the guts to stand toe to toe with Mugabe and tell him this to his face. It is the solution Mugabe is looking for. He must just understand it and then he can implement it. It will work.
Copyright 2007 Nicolaas Johannes Smith
Reviewed 12-04-16
Unidade Real de Valor r
Zimbabwe can normalise everything following another country that had hyperinflation for 10 years and never had your problems.
That country is Brazil.
The Zim government should find out how Brazil stabilised its economy with a real value unit. They called it the Unidade Real de Valor. That is the only way to save Zimbabwe now. But someone has to explain the workings of the non-monetary real value unit to the Zim government.
The Zim governemt´s ideas are not working. Brazil knew what to do. Follow their proven success plan.
Here is a link to the Unidade Real de Valor:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unidade_Real_de_Valor
It was "a non-monetary reference currency"
Reviewed 12-04-16
That country is Brazil.
The Zim government should find out how Brazil stabilised its economy with a real value unit. They called it the Unidade Real de Valor. That is the only way to save Zimbabwe now. But someone has to explain the workings of the non-monetary real value unit to the Zim government.
The Zim governemt´s ideas are not working. Brazil knew what to do. Follow their proven success plan.
Here is a link to the Unidade Real de Valor:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unidade_Real_de_Valor
It was "a non-monetary reference currency"
Reviewed 12-04-16
Terms
The following Trademarks are owned by Nicolaas Johannes Smith
Constant Unit of Purchasing Power ™ 14-07-2019
CUPP ™ 14-07-2019
ÇUPP ™ 14-07-2019
Constant ™ 14-07-2019
€ CUPP ™ 14-07-2019
$ CUPP ™ 14-07-2019
£ CUPP™ 14-07-2019
YEN CUPP™ 14-07-2019
YUAN CUPP ™ 14-07-2019
ROUBLE CUPP ™ 14-07-2019
SWISS FRANC CUPP ™ 14-07-2019
RAND CUPP™ 14-07-2019
Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power™
CMUCPP™
Constant Item Purchasing Power Accounting™
CIPPA™
constant real value non-monetary item™
constant item™
Variable real value non-monetary item™
Variable item™
Accounting dollar-indexation™
Inflation illusion™
The singular implies the use of the plural and small letters imply the use of capital letters: for both cases in all variations and combinations.
Reviewed 12-04-16
Constant Unit of Purchasing Power ™ 14-07-2019
CUPP ™ 14-07-2019
ÇUPP ™ 14-07-2019
Constant ™ 14-07-2019
€ CUPP ™ 14-07-2019
$ CUPP ™ 14-07-2019
£ CUPP™ 14-07-2019
YEN CUPP™ 14-07-2019
YUAN CUPP ™ 14-07-2019
ROUBLE CUPP ™ 14-07-2019
SWISS FRANC CUPP ™ 14-07-2019
RAND CUPP™ 14-07-2019
Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power™
CMUCPP™
Constant Item Purchasing Power Accounting™
CIPPA™
constant real value non-monetary item™
constant item™
Variable real value non-monetary item™
Variable item™
Accounting dollar-indexation™
Inflation illusion™
The singular implies the use of the plural and small letters imply the use of capital letters: for both cases in all variations and combinations.
Reviewed 12-04-16
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)