Only
Daily CPI maintains equity as well as current year results
IAS 29 requires entities in
hyperinflationary economies to restate HC or CC financial statements in terms
of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period. IAS 29 does
not prescribe the use of the monthly published CPI for this purpose. It simply
requires restatement in terms of a general price index. The Daily CPI is based
on the monthly published CPI, i.e., the general price index. IAS 29 has,
however, been implemented since its authorization in 1989 in terms of the
monthly published CPI. In this way IAS 29 has been implementing an imperfect
form of Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power (CMUCPP)
since current year results are not fully maintained when the monthly published
CPI is used. IAS 29 in terms of the monthly CPI can also have absolutely no effect
in a hyperinflationary country. That is what happened in Zimbabwe where IAS 29
was implemented for the last 8 years of hyperinflation with no positive effect
at all.
Brazil implemented CMUCPP in the form of
indexation (monetary correction) in terms of a government supplied daily index
from 1964 till 1994. Price-level restatement in terms of a daily index was
widely used in Latin America during that period. Brazil did not use IAS 29.
Zimbabwe used IAS 29. The result during hyperinflation in the two countries are
very well known. Only the IASB refuses to admit that IAS 29 had no positive effect
in Zimbabwe. Everyone else has the common sense to realize it. The IASB claims
that they first have to have a formal review about what happened before they
can form an opinion about the effect of IAS 29 in Zimbabwe.
The IASB does not understand the effect of CMUCPP in terms of a daily index. Basically, the IASB does not understand CMUCPP as implied in IAS 29. In January 2013 an IASB staff paper stated:
"10. Under current IFRS, there is no particular guidance on how to prepare financial statements stated in constant purchasing power units."
IAS 29 prescribes how to restate HC or CC financial statements in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period.
Only the IASB does not understand that as stated above. PricewaterhouseCoopers, the World Bank and other Big Four audit companies published papers on how IAS 29 gives guidance on how to restate financial statements in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period.
The IASB does not understand the effect of CMUCPP in terms of a daily index. Basically, the IASB does not understand CMUCPP as implied in IAS 29. In January 2013 an IASB staff paper stated:
"10. Under current IFRS, there is no particular guidance on how to prepare financial statements stated in constant purchasing power units."
IAS 29 prescribes how to restate HC or CC financial statements in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period.
Only the IASB does not understand that as stated above. PricewaterhouseCoopers, the World Bank and other Big Four audit companies published papers on how IAS 29 gives guidance on how to restate financial statements in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period.
Nicolaas Smith
Copyright (c) 2005-2013 Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved. No reproduction without permission.
No comments:
Post a Comment