Example
of CMUCPP with a Daily CPI versus IAS 29
All non-monetary receivables and payable
are treated as monetary items under Historical Cost Accounting. They are not monetary
items. Monetary items are defined as constituting the money supply.
Non-monetary receivables and payables are not part of the money supply. They
are constant real value non-monetary items since they are linked to underlying
non-monetary items.
IAS 29 does not specifically require the
implementation of Historical Cost Accounting during hyperinflation. IAS 29
requires the implementation of Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant
Purchasing Power in the form of the restatement of HC or CC financial
statements in terms of the measuring unit current at the balance sheet date.
All non-monetary receivables and payables are thus treated as monetary items
under IAS 29 too. The net “monetary” gain or loss is calculated with reference
to these items under IAS 29.
They are constant real value non-monetary
items under CMUCPP and are accounted as such. There is no net constant
purchasing power gain or loss under ideal CMUCPP with complete coordination. This
results in the maintenance of 100% of the real value of all non-monetary
receivables and payables instead of destroying their real values at the rate of
hyperinflation with the implementation of the stable measuring unit assumption
during the 353 days of the year that the daily general price level is not
recognized under IAS 29. IAS 29 only recognizes the 12 month-end CPIs.
The following example clearly proves the
above:
Hist Cost
|
Historical
|
Cost
|
|||||||
Zim$ Results
|
|||||||||
Date
|
Daily CPI
|
Z$/USD
|
Dr
|
Cr
|
Dr
|
Cr
|
Dr
|
Cr
|
|
Derived
|
Derived
|
USD
|
USD
|
Zim$
|
Zim$
|
USD
|
USD
|
||
1/11/07
|
4 387,69
|
43,8769
|
Capital
|
1000
|
43 877
|
133
|
|||
1/11/07
|
4 387,69
|
43,8769
|
Stock
|
1000
|
43 877
|
133
|
|||
1/11/07
|
4 387,69
|
43,8769
|
Debtors
|
4000
|
175 508
|
531
|
|||
1/11/07
|
4 387,69
|
43,8769
|
Sales
|
4000
|
175 508
|
531
|
|||
30/11/07
|
9 727,86
|
97,2786
|
|||||||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
P+L –CoS
|
1000
|
43 877
|
133
|
|||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Stock
|
1000
|
43 877
|
133
|
|||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Sale
|
4000
|
175 508
|
531
|
|||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
P+L – Sales
|
4000
|
175 508
|
531
|
|||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Net MonetaryLoss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
P+L - Net Mon
Loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Net MonetaryLoss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Dividend
|
3000
|
131 631
|
398
|
|||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Bank
|
3000
|
131 631
|
398
|
IAS 29 with the monthly CPI
|
||||||||
Date
|
Daily CPI
|
Z$/USD
|
Conv
|
Dr
|
Cr
|
Dr
|
Cr
|
|
Derived
|
Derived
|
Factor
|
Zim$
|
Zim$
|
USD
|
USD
|
||
1/11/07
|
4 387,69
|
43,8769
|
Capital
|
3,40
|
149 208
|
451
|
||
1/11/07
|
4 387,69
|
43,8769
|
Stock
|
3,40
|
149 208
|
451
|
||
1/11/07
|
4 387,69
|
43,8769
|
Debtors
|
1,00
|
175 508
|
531
|
||
1/11/07
|
4 387,69
|
43,8769
|
Sales
|
3,40
|
596 831
|
1 804
|
||
30/11/07
|
9 727,86
|
97,2786
|
3,40
|
|||||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
P+L – CoS
|
3,40
|
149 208
|
451
|
||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Stock
|
3,40
|
149 208
|
451
|
||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Sale
|
3,40
|
596 831
|
1 804
|
||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
P+L - Sales
|
3,40
|
596 831
|
1 804
|
||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Net MonetaryLoss
|
421 322
|
1 274
|
|||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
P+L - Net Mon
Loss
|
421 322
|
1 274
|
|||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Net MonetaryLoss
|
421 322
|
1 274
|
|||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Dividend
|
26 301
|
80
|
|||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Bank
|
26 301
|
80
|
CMUCPP (IAS 29) with Daily CPI
|
||||||||
Date
|
Daily CPI
|
Z$/USD
|
Conv
|
Dr
|
Cr
|
Dr
|
Cr
|
|
Derived
|
Derived
|
Factor
|
Zim$
|
Zim$
|
USD
|
USD
|
||
1/11/07
|
4 387,69
|
43,8769
|
Capital
|
7,54
|
330 806
|
1000
|
||
1/11/07
|
4 387,69
|
43,8769
|
Stock
|
7,54
|
330 806
|
1000
|
||
1/11/07
|
4 387,69
|
43,8769
|
Debtors
|
7,54
|
1 323 222
|
4000
|
||
1/11/07
|
4 387,69
|
43,8769
|
Sales
|
7,54
|
1 323 222
|
4000
|
||
30/11/07
|
9 727,86
|
97,2786
|
||||||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
7,54
|
330 806
|
1000
|
|||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Stock
|
7,54
|
330 806
|
1000
|
||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Sale
|
7,54
|
1 323 222
|
4000
|
||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
P+L - Sales
|
7,54
|
1 323 222
|
4000
|
||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Net MonetaryLoss
|
7,54
|
-
|
|||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
P+L - Net Mon
Loss
|
7,54
|
-
|
|||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Net MonetaryLoss
|
7,54
|
-
|
|||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Dividend
|
992 417
|
3000
|
|||
31/12/07
|
33 080,55
|
330,8055
|
Bank
|
992 417
|
3000
|
From the above we can see that:
1.
Under IAS 29 in terms of the
monthly CPI – the way IAS 29 has been implemented since 1990 although a monthly
CPI is not specifically required in the standard, 54.9% of the real value of whatever
capital was still left in Zimbabwe was destroyed, not by hyperinflation, but
the stable measuring unit assumption (HCA) during
the two months of November and Dezember 2007 in the Zimbabwean economy.
That is what happened in the whole economy.
2.
Under ideal Capital Maintenance
in Units of Constant Purchasing Power in terms of a Daily CPI with complete
coordination (everyone doing it – like in Brazil from 1964 to 1994), 100% of
the real value of capital, all receivables and payables and all current year
profits would have been maintained. That is, in principle, what happened during
the very high and hyperinflation in Brazil from 1964 till 1994 when that
country implemented a form of CMCUPP (indexation or monetary correction) in
terms of a government supplied Daily Index.
Nicolaas Smith
Copyright (c) 2005-2013 Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved. No reproduction without permission.